Maddogg’s Real Truth Guest Writer, OMIG Investigator, Ricardo Valdez
OJ and Nicole Simpson, Ron Goldman, LA DA Gil Garcetti, Deputy DA Marcia Clark, and Deputy DA Bill Hodgman
Something came back to remind us this week when our chairman, Dr. Henry S. Johnson was invited to speak on OJ Simpson’s upcoming parole on ABC this past week and was abruptly cut off. Of course ABC prefaced Dr. Johnson as being a friend of OJ Simpson rather than what he was before meeting Simpson, the founder and chairman of the Ocean Medical Investigative Group, which was created to examine irregularities that Dr. Johnson and other doctors found in the medical testimony of how the two victims Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson were killed.
After ABC’s abrupt pulling of the plug on Thursday, we went back into our archives to re-examine when L.A. County Deputy D.A. Lucianne Coleman began receiving a line of complaints in the internal complaints department she managed. Coleman began doing her required due diligence regarding the matter which was not outside complaints but internal complaints coming from members of the Los Angeles Police Department in July of 1994, just one month after the murders of Ronald Goldman and OJ Simpson’s ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson.
Her mission, as the complaints officer for internal affairs within the D.A.’s office, was to determine the validity of official allegations of Mark Fuhrman wearing Nazi paraphernalia in the West Side Division precinct and planting swastikas on the lockers of other officers he didn’t like for their marital choices of women outside of “their race”.
The now famous retired and financially well healed Simpson prosecutor, Marcia Clark, and others Coleman alleged in a deposition attempted to blunt that investigation by putting pressure on her to stand down. At the time Fuhrman was key to the Simpson case since it was he who allegedly discovered the most crucial piece of evidence that tied Simpson to the murders, the bloody glove found at Simpson’s sprawling Rockingham residence in Los Angele’s wealthy Brentwood.
Former L.A.P.D. Detective Mark Fuhrman and Marcia Clark on the witness stand in the OJ Simpson criminal trial before being caught committing perjury.
However, Coleman’s pursuit of this investigation wasn’t just about the activities of Fuhrman alone it was about other officers as well in higher command positions alleged to be neo-Nazi fascist sympathizers protecting the actions of corrupt, racist, and brutal police officers like Fuhrman. This would be articulated in real time by August of 1994, less than two months after the murders and soon after in 1994 submitted to the publisher of Dove Books, Michael Viner as a preceding manuscript for a book entitled LEGACY OF DECEPTION by noted true crime author Stephen Singular. He was approached in Denver, Colorado reportedly by an LAPD insider with close connections to the malfeasance that took place to frame OJ Simpson, particularly as it related to Fuhrman planting that glove on his property. He contacted Singular as a result of reading a prior book written by Singular entitled TALKED TO DEATH. That book chronicled the neo-Nazis who came down from their headquarters in Northwest Idaho to execute a Jewish talk show host named Alan Berg.
The purpose of him making the long trek to Denver was a futile attempt to make the public aware by using Singular to inform first the defense team of the dangers emerging within the LAPD of a cabal of neo-Nazi sympathizers moving into areas of government in Los Angeles as opposed to the public perception of hooligans on the outside.
This insider explained to Singular that they had thoroughly infiltrated the LAPD and had become a threat to employing their fascist authority against the democratic freedoms that people enjoyed in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, especially against people of color. Michael Viner, now deceased was a wealthy Jewish president and founder of the popular Dove Book Publishing house. However, according to Singular, his book LEGACY OF DECEPTION would be delayed a year and almost permanently sacked until after the Simpson trial in late 1995 when he flew to L.A. and confronted Viner . Viner now wanted to scrap the book because according to Singular he believed OJ Simpson to be guilty of murder. He would ultimately capitulate and publish LEGACY.
I was struck by the irony of Marcia Clark’s actions in her to attempt to thwart the neo-Nazi investigation of Coleman in 1994 since Clark is a Jewish woman herself who undoubtedly understands history and the dangers of allowing such fascist leanings to gain power and control inside governmental agencies.
However, I was reminded again of that same attempt by Clark in 1994 to censor and protect a false narrative when ABC’s Dan Abrams was calling out Dr. Henry Johnson this week on the ABC network’s GOOD MORNING AMERICA. Abrams accused Dr. Johnson of acting as he alleged “disrespectfully” for challenging the false narrative that has been promoted for the last 20 years regarding the OJ Simpson trial as being what Dr. Johnson alleged a complete fraud. Johnson should know something since he has been the chairman of the Ocean Medical Investigative Group, also known as OMIG, for the last 21 years. It is a group he jointly founded after examining contradictions in the autopsy reports on Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman in the fall of 1996, the organization has gone on to uncover several items of malfeasance beyond the autopsy reports in the Simpson case that lead to the conclusion that Simpson was targeted and framed. Some of the malfeasance even involved questionable actions of members of his own defense team.
Abrams incendiary response was that he had done his due diligence by following what was presented as evidence in the subsequent civil trial against Simpson that began in the fall of 1996 and that Dr. Johnson’s allegations of fraud were “Disrespectful”. We must assume that Abrams presumably meant disrespect for the integrity of the trials, or at least in his opinion, the civil trial. However, anyone with any common sense as an investigator realizes that assuming the veracity of evidence after it has been presented is not the same as independently examining evidence outside the control of what authorities are presenting, especially members of the Los Angeles justice system. This is particularly the case when there are glaring contradictions in such presented evidence as in the Simpson case where there are many. As a lawyer and so called investigative journalist Abrams should know better to simply accept what has been plopped on his platter as veritable evidence before springing into action to denigrate another investigator. The whole Los Angeles justice system would later come under federal scrutiny for planting evidence on thousands of innocent men in the Rampart’s Police Precinct Scandal in 1998. Thousands were falsely charged and obligated to accept lengthy plea deals of 8-10 years in prison to avoid the possibility of remaining in prison for as long as 30 years as in the instance of a young Latino male, Michael Ovando. The conduct was so insidious that it would peak the interest of movie producers to make a movie highlighting the corrupt police practices entitled TRAINING DAYS starring Denzel Washington.
However, this has become the state of journalism in America where you have such characters like that of Dan Abrams, Geraldo Rivera, Howard Stern and Harvey Levin who have turned a respectable profession into tabloid buffoonery for pecuniary gain. The Simpson case appears to be clearly the embarkation point where journalists became comfortable with lackadaisical reporting. Without any major criticism, they allowed pundits to elevate tabloid rags like the National Enquirer to a standing of credibility more than the preeminent news establishments such as the New York Times, Washington Post, and Chicago Tribune. Now we are fully immersed in electronic tabloids delivering the daily news like Harvey Levin’s TMZ program that is all over the place on television channels. Not only do they deliver the gossipy tabloid celebrity news they pretend to pass themselves off as presenting more in-depth knowledge of serious news events. In the matter of the Simpson case, Levin once intervened for about 6 minutes with a long dissertation about the truth regardng his experience with Nazi activity on the LA police force. Then he topped it off with stating that Fuhrman’s involvement or the Nazi activity itself had nothing to do with the Simpson case, in which he adamantly concluded Simpson committed murder. Here again, Levin has done no real due diligence in the Simpson case but has only accepted what he’s been told. So, this adulterated madness is what people absorb and are left to walk away with because Harvey Levin of TMZ told them it was so.
Instead of maintaining their integrity they all sold their souls and began wallowing in the mud of hearsay and innuendo as it related to the Simpson case while pandering for advertising revenue. If you want to say that we should understand the laws of economics, and its principles of supply and demand, I will concede to that argument as long as you realize that you can’t have it both ways. Either you are going to maintain integrity or you’re going to sacrifice to engage in becoming a commercial whore for pecuniary gain. Now the representative journalists of the establishment news organizations bristle when an animated character like Donald Trump chides them for presenting “fake news”. Trump’s gut shot may hurt but it’s true and we can trace the fall from grace back to the Simpson trial 22 years ago. That is when one can visualize the readiness to accept contradictory evidence and information from sworn court officers in the Simpson case as being true. Now it has come back to haunt the industry with Trump-like accusations so a Dan Abrams is made to look like a fool jumping to defend Simpson evidence when he knows he’s done no due diligence. He thus creates a further spectacle when attacking a black medical doctor who along with his organization has deliberately done their homework. Abrams hence has caused curiosity to emerge in an area that others want to remain concealed regarding their false narrative of the ‘TRIAL OF THE CENTURY’.
Before Dr. Johnson could offer a rebuttal to Abrams’ reproach producers were in the doctor’s ear telling him senior producers wanted him off the air and they were pulling the plug. This is an attempt to control the message in America which is a major plunge by fascist censors. Though they may continue to run from the truth they cannot hide from the truth that individuals as sworn officers of the court in Los Angeles used people like you, Dan Abrams, in conjunction with the electronic media industry to become an unwitting participant, at least initially, in the framing of OJ Simpson for power, position, and pecuniary gain. When you people plan to regain your dignity and integrity to cease and desist in continuing to promulgate such a catastrophically socially destructive lie call us at OMIG since we’re not going anywhere. WWW.SERPENTSRISING.COM