By Maddogg Buttkickin’ Brown
The smoke billowing above the horizon in Hollywood is signaling a potential impending lawsuit regarding what some are saying is another Jewish betrayal of the African-American community with the visual on-screen analysis of the 20 year fraud known as the OJ Simpson case and its subsequent phony evidence entered in the so called trial of the century. However, this time the additional fraud is being allegedly perpetrated by another group of Jews promoting an additional fraud with the movie itself. The ongoing Simpson fraud is described in an article that appeared this week on the Show Biz 411 website in an article written by Roger Friedman
with the bill-boarding headline:
OJ Innocent? Producers Will Try and Prove it In New Movie About Disbarred Lawyer and Phony Phone Call
This recent effort promoting a new motion picture by British film producer, Joshua Newton, “NICOLE, O.J. and me” alleging the fraudulent act that framed OJ Simpson is the concealment of exculpatory evidence that could have exonerated him. Truthfully, it is an act that others in a black investigative organization called OMIG (Ocean Medical Investigative Group) discovered in 1998. The evidence entered by attorneys in OJ Simpson’s California trial in 1995, the crucial Juditha Brown phone records, after behind closed-door lawyer wrangling is what the blacks alleged was an unholy alliance of attorneys mutually agreeing to enter alleged phony evidence into the Simpson trial by stipulation for their own pecuniary gain and notoriety. That evidence, Exhibit 35, which changed the final time of that crucial last phone call 3 times of when Simpson’s ex-wife was last known to be alive, OMIG’s black investigators and its chairman, Dr. Henry S. Johnson, have long proclaimed to be a fraud. It is also evidence that was surreptitiously removed in April, 1998 from the Simpson case file BA-097211 by one of the Simpson prosecutors, deputy DA Bill Hodgman from DA Gil Garcetti’s office 2 months after Dr. Johnson raised concerns about the credibility of that phone call due to the impossible travel time created by the third and final time change of 09:37 PM.
Deputy DA Bill Hodgman, and LA DA Gil Garcetti
Juditha and Louis Brown (left) and one of their daughter’s Denise Brown (right)
The third change of 09:37 PM created virtually an impossible time for the Brown family to drive that night between the Mezzaluna Restaurant in Brentwood where they ate their last meal with daughter Nicole and the Brown’s residence at the south end of Orange County at Dana Point’s Monarch Bay within one hour after leaving at approximately 08:45 PM. The commute in the best of times is at minimum approximately a 90 minute commute and certainly could have been longer in 1994 when construction was just beginning on the HOV lane system and wasn’t completed until 1998 and the CAL state highway 73 through the San Joaquin Hills a toll road under construction would not open until 1996. Both of the Brown parents Lou and Juditha told authorities on separate occasions that the last time they talked to their daughter, Nicole, was at 11 PM on the night she was killed. Recent California Department of Transportation Highway Data for the night of June 12, 1994 between the Brown’s departure time of 8-9 PM shows highway conditions due to the on-going construction and traffic volume that did not favor the Brown family arriving in time for Juditha to make that all important 09:37 PM phone call. In order for the 09:37 call the Browns had to maintain a constant speed of 72 MPH to arrive at their home in Dana Point 72 miles away within an hour. The speed dropped below 30 MPH across all five lanes through an 8 mile zone they had to travel according to data provided to OMIG by traffic engineers of the California Dept. of Transportation. This implied that the Brown’s vehicle would have had to increase its speed constantly for a minimum of 8 miles to over 114 MPH by adding the difference in speed on top of 72 MPH or 72 + 42 = 114. OMIG does not believe that the Brown family would recklessly increase their speed to 114 MPH with 2 infant grand children riding in the back seat.
Dr. Henry S. Johnson, a Los Angeles medical doctor and OMIG Chairman
However, Newton is telling this fascinating story regarding the Simpson case, subsequently dubbed “trial of the century”, through the eyes of a white attorney named Douglas McCann. McCann was the attorney the black principals of OMIG hired on behalf of Simpson to act as the attorney of record to bring forth their allegations in a court of law regarding the removal of certain documents surreptitiously from the Simpson case file and concealed by former Simpson prosecutors. However, it was black investigators that revealed those hidden facts and not McCann, OMIG investigators claim. “McCann is a decent fellow” according to OMIG investigator T.H. Johnson, “and we were glad when he came on board right before 1999 but Doug did not have the temperament, the time, nor streetwise persona to do the trench work of pursuing the clandestine documentation and knowledge regarding the framing of Simpson”. According to him, McCann was for all intent and purposes OMIG’s attorney of record and ” if he’s truthful” Johnson said, “McCann will tell you that, but if he doesn’t the compilation of letters and documents produced by the actual OMIG investigative team members who in my department were black and Hispanic men and women will impeach any lies that Josh Newton alleges in his film concerning the role of who was central to this investigation”. “We pursued this investigation intensively” Johnson said ” for the last 20 years because as we predicted and felt the impact of the fraud would have a detrimental impact on blacks and particularly black males”. ” The poison of racial animus that was being recklessly injected into the mainstream of public discourse in this country at that time has been manifested in the inexplicable acts of alleged professional police offficers unloading their service revolvers in the backs of innocent unarmed black men 20 years after the fact” he said. “We are glad that McCann joined our effort but it wasn’t anything that he could consummately relate to since the events of the day he understandably could not see as we saw how it impacted Dr. Johnson and I, or other people of color so we had no concern about any lack of a same level of enthusiasm as we had” according to Johnson “that was not the role we expected of McCann when we asked him to come aboard”.
Newton, who is Jewish, has discounted the role of blacks in the motion picture script he wrote allegedly by telling T.H. Johnson he could not sell it to the film’s financial investors who Newton allegedly claimed would not believe that an audience would buy the fact that blacks had made such discoveries. “Apparently Josh Newton believed as a result such a movie would not be profitable to produce with a true story-line of blacks conducting the critical analysis and making the crucial decisions regarding the successful investigative discoveries relative to the suppression of evidence in the Simpson case” Johnson said.
Josh Newton, Producer/Director and his proposed Simpson movie in 2018
The behind the scene combatants are at loggerheads over money as well as the truth of how the story is to be told regarding this fraud sold to the public as the “O.J. Simpson Trial of the Century” in 1995.
T H E H I S T O R Y OF A SORDID MATTER
According to our sources, investigators have alleged that Marcia Clark, a Jewish woman, along with other Jews in and outside of LA County’s justice apparatus with surnames like Shapiro, Golden, Goldman, Goldberg and others aided in the concealment of evidence that could have exonerated Simpson ;and passed fraudulent information on to other Jews in the news media to implicate OJ Simpson in the infamous murders. Other receiving such questionable evidence in 1994 included Jews like Geraldo Rivera, Barbara Walters, and Chuck Grodin in the powerful broadcast media regarding the Simpson case but each one while vilifying Simpson failed to do any meaningful due diligence relative to the veracity of the evidence they were given.
Those sworn court officers like Clark are accused as also were members of the press of engaging in the most insidious feeding frenzy in the nation’s history for pecuniary gain that recklessly destroyed an American sports icon, a black man, OJ Simpson, based upon nothing more than hearsay and adulterated evidence.
“The lawyers unethically we allege went behind closed doors and mutually agreed to violate one of the most sacred obligations of a common law court and that was to deprive the “triers of fact” the jury through the use of stipulation from examining evidence favorable to OJ Simpson, namely the phone records of Juditha Brown, exhibit 35, in the OJ criminal trial” according to Johnson. “Stipulation is an agreement by opposing attorneys that was abused and it was done in a manner as the preeminent legal scholar on evidence John Henry Wigmore stated and we allege to enter false evidence for the purpose of the lawyers pecuniary gain or personal interests” Johnson said.
“What hurt me for a number of years was to find out that attorney Johnnie Cochran knew about and went along with the concealment of these phone records that could have exonerated Simpson; however, after reading his autobiographies regarding his life, the Simpson case, and other important cases of his involvement in history I forgave him after seven years by 2007” Johnson said.
” I believe he had a greater cause than the enormously publicized Simpson trial to do what he did after reading the book LAST MAN STANDING regarding the framing of an earlier Cochran client who’d spent about 29 years locked up by the name of Elmer “Geronimo” Pratt.
The ambivalence on the part of the press, OMIG’s investigative team coordinator, Johnson argues, is worthy of in-depth psychological analysis at the highest level of psychiatric research concerning mass hysteria. He claims that those members of the press claiming to be investigative journalists who went along with perpetrating this fraud should be ashamed of themselves. “They truthfully knew that they did no due diligence and their failure to do so had them participating by their own volition in the destruction of an individual without questioning the integrity of the evidence they were told in any cogent or effective manner” according to Johnson. “They are, it appears, too shallow to comprehend that what they have engaged in is mob violence, a public lynching, based on cat calls of this nigger is guilty in regard to the question of OJ Simpson’s guilt” according to him.
Clark is alleged to have impeded an internal affairs investigation by launching a verbal attack on another Los Angeles County deputy D.A. Lucienne Coleman, the internal complaints officer within the DA’s office who went to Clark in an effort to get her to slow down with her trial movement until a comprehensive investigation concerning detective Mark Fuhrman was completed.
Coleman and other deputy DA’s in her department were told by several other LAPD officers from various precincts within a month of the murders in July 1994 of Fuhrman’s alleged neo-Nazi activity within his West side precinct, his alleged intimate knowledge concerning the breast enhancement of Simpson’s ex-wife, and his corrupt conduct as an officer regarding planting evidence. Coleman considered the internal affairs investigation to be vital to the credibility of the DA’s office and the LAPD due to Fuhrman being the indispensable detective who was key to the potential high profile Simpson case. However, along with Coleman’s vilification by Marcia Clark, she would speak of the internal affairs officers treating her with disdain as if she were the culprit and not Fuhrman for doing her job as well as others making her a pariah within the LADA’s office. Coleman claimed the LAPD was “circling the wagons” in an attempt to defend Fuhrman who they felt early was being unjustly accused of planting the glove, the only evidence that tied Simpson to the murders, rather than the person they considered to be guilty, O.J. Simpson.
Other officers allegedly in the LAPD in higher command positions were said to be neo-Nazi sympathizers by an anonymous LAPD insider talking to author Stephen Singular a thousand miles away in Denver, Colorado around the same time as Coleman was talking to Clark about Fuhrman’s neo-Nazi activities. Singular would go on to present the manuscript of his book on the Simpson case, LEGACY OF DECEPTION, to the owner of Dove Books in October of 1994 after parting ways with Simpson’s defense team. The anonymous LAPD insider who was talking to Singular had read a prior book Singular had written about neo-Nazis from the Aryan movement’s headquarters in Idaho called “The Order” who’d killed a Jewish talk show host by the name of Allen Berg in his driveway, entitled TALKED TO DEATH. The LAPD anonymous insider told Singular he had read TALKED TO DEATH and that was why he was reaching out to him to tell him the truth of what was going on inside the LAPD and what had actually occurred in the Simpson case.
Denver Radio Talk Show Host, Allen Berg, gunned down outside his home in his driveway by members of a white supremacist group called “The Order” in 1984.
Singular wound up coming to LA in August of 1994 to talk with the Simpson defense team and would convey information, subsequently confirmed by Simpson attorneys, that the LAPD insider told him would be found as evidence at Simpson’s Rockingham residence that was heretofore unknown to the defense or prosecution allegedly left at the site by Fuhrman. The LAPD insider indicated that Fuhrman had visited Simpson’s property twice during the dark night of the murders and planted the glove that was found on Simpson’s property tying him to the murders the second time he went there with the now designated lead detectives Tom Lange and Phil Vannatter. Both of those gloves have lies told by Fuhrman regarding them as well. Regarding the one found at Simpson’s residence OMIG investigators point out something that only a few others have noted and that under the airconditioner on the back side of the guesthouse in which Kato Kaelin stayed where the Roickingham glove was found is approximately 70 yards in from the street where Simpson allegedly left a trail of blood upon leaving his parked Bronco. However, there is no blood trail leading that 210 feet to the glove nor is there according to Fuhrman’s own testimony a blood trail leading away from that glove 210 feet back to the Rockingham gate where alleged Simpson blood was found. Fuhrman just blatantly lied about when he is seen pointing to the glove in another celebrated case photo. He testified that he was ordered to return to the murder site after daylight around 7:00 AM and find the police photographer Rolf Rokahr to take a picture to compare to the glove he’d “discovered” at Rockingham. However, when Rolf Rokahr finally took the witness stand a few months later he would testify that the photo of Fuhrman pointing at the glove was taken before he departed for Simpson’s Rockingham residence with the senior detectives. In fact, Rockahr testified, that photo of Fuhrman pointing at the glove was taken in complete darkness at around 04:15 AM instead of approximately 07:15 AM as Fuhrman had testified or almost an hour and a half before sunrise which was at 05:41 AM on the morning of June 13, 1994. Thus, OMIG investigators point out that the inexplicable reason as to why Fuhrman would lie about when he ordered Rokahr to take that photo once again raises questions and doubts about the credibility of Fuhrman as well as the most crucial piece of evidence that even ties Simpson to the murders; the glove.
The Simpson case in all its manifestations proves to still be fascinating and thus we can maybe answer Roger Friedman’s sense or perplexity as to “why someone” would want to make this movie. However, OMIG is pleased that someone is interested in making it but certain things regarding the movie must be acceptable to those who truly conducted the investigation into this massive fraud. This one concerning the proposed Josh Newton movie and the tension with OMIG’s principals appears to be more exciting for the wrangling behind the scenes than even what is proposed on screen. Need we say, stay tuned?
6 thoughts on “SMOKE BEHIND THE SCENES IN NEW O.J. SIMPSON MOVIE BECOMES MORE TENSE”
Excellent analysis, except for the Jewish angle. Sure, Marcia Clark, Henry Goldberg, and many other principals in the case are Jewish, but the plot to kill Nicole and Goldman was certainly not a Jewish one. Clark and the rest had book deals in the works, and if the prosecution discovered that someone other than Simpson committed these murders, those book deals would go bye-bye. (Clark reportedly got a $4.2 million advance for her book.)
You’re almost spot-on on the time from Mezzaluna to Monarch Bay. I believe it’s more than 72 miles door to door — closer to 78, but if Juditha made her call at 9:37, it means the Browns arrived at their house no later than 9:35 PM. That gives them 50 minutes to travel 72 ( or 78) miles, many of which were on city streets, not the 405. In order to complete the trip in 50 minutes, they would have to have averaged 83.6 mph door-to-door, not 72. (That’s using 72 miles as the distance.) The Browns drove a loaded 6-cylinder Jeep Cherokee, its passengers being Louis and Juditha Brown, Denise, Denise’s kid, and a friend.
But the impossible timeline overlooks a key piece of evidence. Assuming the Browns arrived at 10:37, not 9:37, why was Goldman given Juditha’s eyeglasses to take to Nicole? Mezzaluna should not have even known the glasses were missing before the phone calls were made. This means that Ron Goldman was DISPATCHED TO HIS DEATH by people at Mezzaluna.
I have been working on this since 1994 and have lots of other info to share.
No where in the article does the author say that Jews orchestrated, in your words, “the plot to kill Nicole”. What the Maddogg does say is that Marcia Kleks, Horowitz, Clark took advantage of the results of what could assume to become a celebrity case/trial to take place once she received the out of place call by an acquaintance in the S.I.D. of the LAPD’s Robbery/Homicide division, Phil Vannatter. The proper protocol was if a deputy D.A.’s advice or presence was required at a crime site a hotline set up in the DA’s office was to be called and fielded by the Deputy D.A. on duty. However, Vannatter chose to make a personal call that early morning to Marcia Clark’s personal residence to tell her to first come to Simpson’s Rockingham residence. The suspicion is that this plot came together long before the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman via Marcia Clark when she left the $90,000 prosecution litigation department for high profile case management that paid $110,000 a year. It was there she allegedly became socially cozy, as smoking and drinking buddies, with Det. Phil Vannatter, of the high profile case division of Robbery/Homicide. For her to return to the treadmill and abandon a $110 thousand dollar position for a $90 thousand dollar position is suspect unless the move was pre-planned that one ever Vannatter found the right celebrity profile case she was to be alerted. Whatever other pecuniary benefits were to be shared, who knows, but it is certainly plausible that that is what occurred because it was quite evident, along with her peer’s allegations, that Marcia Clark was no where to being one of the top prosecutors to be assigned such a high profile case as this. That could be argued simply in the lackadaisical manner of her jury selection that did not favor a balance for the prosecution. The fact that 75% of the jurors seated could be African American women in a city whose population of African Americans is less than 10% should have always been a factor of suspicion that this was a fraud, along with agreeing to protect themselves from the statutory penalties for this fraud if revealed by removing the death penalty as a consequence for Simpson were it all to fail and he fraudulently convicted. Marcia Clark or no other had a book deal in the making until the reality of this trial was set in motion, however, the facts are as they were. A Jewish woman knowingly conspired to interfere with an internal affairs investigation on a neo-Nazi, Mark Fuhrman, protected allegedly by neo-Nazi sympathizers in higher command positions within the LAPD. The evidence indicates that Fuhrman lied about worse things than using the N-word, particularly when he lied about when he first contacted the LAPD photographer to take a photo of the matching glove at the murder site to the one he would subsequently “find” at Simpson’s Rockingham estate. The fact that he photographed that glove a half hour before going to Simpson’s house implies that he was determined to frame Simpson, the fact that he lied about receiving an order after 7 AM to go back to Bundy and take an initial photo simply was fodder for the public to cover up his malfeasance and Marcia Kleks, Horowitz, Clark went along with it, and then disseminated that madness to the likes of Rivera, Grodin, Walters, and others in the media with the same cultural background. What they did with the help of powerful people in the media was undermine the Common Law system of justice in this country and tap into the pool of racial animus to disarm responsible white folk, particularly in the media and press, who failed to do any meaningful due diligence. This cannot be argued because it is a matter of record, as well as their Jewish heritage, and Simpson and the jurors’ heritage as being African American. The only difference is unlike the former, the latter cannot hide.
Charles Grodens low rated CSNBC talk show never gained any viewership until he became “psychic” and proclaimed OJ Simpson guilty of double homicide just before catching a jet plane for Chicago. Recall Groden had a role as a doctor in the Robert Evans/ Roman Polakski satanic 1968 thriller “Rosemary’s Baby”. The Simpson case is rife with Scientologists and former Charles Manson prosecutors and others from that milue. Criminal LAPD officer Phil VanAtter was involved in the Roman Polanski rape case of a 13 year old girl and it is said they became friendly. Before Ron Goldman worked at Mezzaluna he was a waiter at a west LA Italian Restaurant owned by British actress Angela Landsbury’s daughter Dierdre and her husband an Italian Count. In the late 1960’s Diredre was a part of the Manson family with her mother Angela financing the cults food and drugs needs.
What a deadly web we weave when we practice to deceive.
If you have further information you want to impart to OMIG we will pass it on if it is sent to our email address, at email@example.com
“But the impossible timeline overlooks a key piece of evidence. Assuming the Browns arrived at 10:37, not 9:37, why was Goldman given Juditha’s eyeglasses to take to Nicole? Mezzaluna should not have even known the glasses were missing before the phone calls were made. This means that Ron Goldman was DISPATCHED TO HIS DEATH by people at Mezzaluna.”
Goldman was given Juditha Brown’s glasses allegedly because Nicole after being called by her mother called back to the Mezzaluna and asked to speak to Ron, and asked him if he would bring them by her house. Our belief is that the Browns may have picked up some time beyond Long Beach and the HOV construction zone that allowed them to arrive in time to make a 10:17 PM call initially to the Mezzaluna which was offered by Shapiro in Judge Kathleen Kennedy Powell’s chambers at approximately 12:05 PM Noon on July 08, 1994, the last day of the preliminary hearing. On July 09, 1994 someone allegedly close to the phone records told Linda Stasi the reporter for the New York Daily News that the phone call to the Mezzaluna lasted 11 minutes and ended at 10:28 PM. Ron Goldman’s time card showed a punch out time of 09:33 PM, however, the waitress Tia Gavin stated to defense investigators that she believed that the time clock was not adjusted for daylight savings time. Although, John DeBello, the day manager of the Mezzaluna would allege that he changed the time clock, the fact that he did not correct other malfunctioning clocks that were arguably more important that a time clock in the restaurant leaves us to believe he did not truly adjust the time clock an hour for daylight savings. The number of hours employees worked was always the same whether it was four hours between 5:30 and 9:30 or 6:30 and 10:30 the number of hours for pay was not going to change. However, the actual time and date on the clock on the cash register being off for patrons was a more major problem, IMO, than the time clock but DeBello or Keith Zlomszowitch did not bother to correct any of the malfunctioning time pieces for their patrons inside the restaurant. Even the time on the American Express Card payment for $217.00 embedded by the cash register for the bill that Nicole paid for the family’s meal at the Mezzaluna on that Sunday night is incorrect.