OMIG (OCEAN MEDICAL INVESTIGATIVE GROUP) ITS MOTTO
“No one, or nothing, is granted the privilege of presumption, all evidence must come to the table and stand upon its own merits”.  ALTHOUGH WE WERE AROUND IN THOSE EARLY YEARS STARTING IN 1996, OMIG WOULD NOT TAKE ON A FULL CREW TO EXAMINE EVERY NOOK AND CRANNY WHERE EVIDENCE HAS BEEN CONCEALED IN THE SIMPSON CASE.  HOWEVER, THE ISSUE OF SIMPSON’S ABILITY TO WEAR THOSE SHOES RAISED SOME VERY INTERESTING QUESTIONS.

WE FOUND IN THE OJ SIMPSON CASE THAT NOT ONLY DO YOU HAVE TO BE SUSPICIOUS ABOUT PEOPLE TELLING YOU ABOUT A PERSON’S GUILT BASED ON SHOE SIZE, YOU HAVE TO BE AWARE ABOUT OTHER ASPECTS WHERE THEY FOR THEIR OWN PECUNIARY GAIN WANT TO FLIM FLAM OR FLEECE THE PUBLIC.

CONSIDER THIS……

SHOE SIZE DOESN’T SAY ANYTHING DEFINITIVE, THOUGH MANY OF YOU ASSUME IT DOES. HOWEVER, IF YOU WERE PUT TO THE TEST AND I WERE TO PULL A THOUSAND DOLLARS OUT OF MY BREAST POCKET AND BET YOU ON THE SPOT TO TELL ME HOW MANY INCHES IS PRECISELY IN YOUR SHOE SIZE OR EVEN MORE SO, HOW MANY INCHES IS THE ACTUAL LENGTH OF YOUR FOOT, MANY OF YOU WOULD START TREMBLING , YOUR KNEES WOULD THREATEN TO BUCKLE, BECAUSE YOU WOULD BE AFRAID TO CALL THE BET. THE TRUTH IS YOU NEVER THINK ABOUT THE ACTUAL DIMENSIONAL LENGTH OF YOUR FOOT.

FURTHERMORE, SIZES EVEN WITHIN THE ENGLISH SIZING SYSTEM OF INCHES FOR SHOES IS NOT STANDARD.  A SIZE 12 IN BRITAIN’S U.K. IS NOT NECESSARILY A SIZE 12 IN THE U.S. IT WILL USUALLY SAY, U.K. SIZE 12 , US SIZE 13 OR VICE VERSA. WHEN YOU GO INTO THE CONTINENTAL SYSTEM ACROSS THE ENGLISH CHANNEL WHICH USES THE METRIC SYSTEM AS THE ITALIAN SHOE SOLE MANUFACTURER’S WHO MADE THE SHOE SOLE THAT PRODUCED THE BLOODY SHOE PRINT AT THE MURDER SITE OF SIMPSON’S EX-WIFE, THE SIZE 46 U2287 SILGA SHOE SOLE, THEN YOU ARE LEFT WITH COMPARING THE METRIC SIZE TO ITS EQUIVALENT SIZE 12 UNDER THE ENGLISH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM.

OJ Simpson allegedly wearing Bruno Magli shoes, above; and below, FBI Special Agent William Bodziak who allegedly identified them as Bruno Magli.  Two FBI agents had already been dismissed from Simpson’s trial for their past history of slanting evidence towards the prosecution.  Bodziak’s actions would I fear upset the society by the half truths he was alleging.

HOWEVER, WITH OJ BEING LOCKED UP IN THE LA COUNTY JAIL FOR ALMOST A YEAR, YOU’D THINK THAT THE FBI AGENT, WILLIAM BODZIAK, WOULD GO THERE AND MEASURE THE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OF HIS FOOT. BUT HE DID NOT, AND WHEN HE ASKED FOR A SEARCH WARRANT TO GO AND EXAMINE THE SHOES IN SIMPSON’S CLOSET HE WAS DENIED. SO ALL HE HAD WERE A PAIR OF REEBOK TENNIS SHOES THAT THE POLICE HAD BROKEN THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND DON’T EVEN REMEMBER WHEN THEY WERE TURNED INTO THE LAPD PROPERTY DEPARTMENT AS EVIDENCE.

THE FBI AGENT TESTIFIED THAT THEY WERE “REPRESENTED” TO HIM AS BEING THE ACTUAL SHOES OF SIMPSON. BE CAREFUL WITH WORDS, BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE ALLOW OTHERS THE PRIVILEGE OF PRESUMPTION RELATIVE TO WHAT PEOPLE SAY, ESPECIALLY IF THEY WEAR A BADGE. OMIG DOES NOT….ALL EVIDENCE MUST COME TO THE TABLE AND IT MUST STAND UPON ITS OWN MERITS.

WAIT ONE MINUTE NOW……

BESIDES THAT THE SHOE SOLE THAT MADE THE PRINT IN BLOOD WAS SOLD TO 20 OTHER SHOE COMPANIES, BUT AS YOU CAN SEE THE SPACE WHERE YOU FIND THE LOGO DOESN’T TOUCH THE GROUND. SO THE QUESTION BECOMES HOW COULD THE FBI AGENT TELL THAT SHOE PRINT CAME FROM A BRUNO MAGLI SHOE THAT HAD THAT SOLE ATTACHED TO ITS BOTTOM RATHER THAN 20 OTHER BRANDS WITH THE SAME SHOE SOLE ATTACHED AT THE MURDER SITE IN 1994?

UH OH!

THE PHOTOS WITH OJ ALLEGEDLY IN THEM DIDN’T APPEAR UNTIL THREE YEARS LATER IN 1997 AFTER THEIR NEGATIVES HAD TRAVELED TO EUROPE FOR SIX MONTHS AND THEN RETURNED TO THE U.S. YOU KNOW THAT THE UK AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC ARE THE BEST AT MANIPULATING PHOTOGRAPHS….JUST SAYIN’.