AN ERRONEOUS O.J. LIE FOUND IN A SHOE PRINT

OJs Green full foot padded 001

MADDOGG REAL TRUTH Guest Contributor, J.W. Parada, OMIG Team Investigator

Above is an image of OJ Simpson’s foot, highlighted in green, overlaid on top of the alleged Bruno Magli (actually SILGA U2887 size 46/size 12) shoe sole.  It appears to be quite an uncomfortable fit for a rather expensive $180 pair of casual shoes.   The actual photos of the sidewalk tiles at the Bundy Drive murder site appear to have even smaller shoe prints than the above since the red outlined shoe sole above measured 12 and 1/4 inches.  Those fitting within the side walk tiles appear to be no more in length than the dimensions of the Bundy tiles themselves.

det. langemarcia clark in court

LAPD Robbery/Homicide Det. Tom Lange (L) and Deputy LA DA Marcia Clark (R)

When asked by Deputy D.A. Marcia Clark, Detective Tom Lange of the LAPD testified during the Simpson trial, that the sidewalk tiles were 11 and 1/2 inches square.

shoe print at Bundy enlarged

It appears that officials conspired to frame this man, who was a celebrated sports icon, O.J. Simpson.  Two prior FBI agents had been excluded by Judge Lance Ito in appearing for the prosecution because of their prior revealed activities of engaging in malfeasance and slanting evidence against defendants to favor state prosecutors.  It appears that Judge Ito may have missed a dangerous third expert witness when he didn’t deny FBI Special Agent, William Bodziak, from testifying during the Simpson trial.

bodziak william fbi special agent    fbi image

FBI, Special Agent, William Bodziak

Bodziak’s standard of determining the shoes which made those bloody footprints at the murder site belonged to Simpson was some of the worst technical testimony that a so called professional could provide.  Furthermore, after the lengthy investigation of these discrepancies by OMIG’s investigators regarding the shoe soles that made those prints, Bodziak has brought disgrace onto the image of the FBI since he knew that he only had a one out of twenty chance in selecting the correct brand of shoe that contained that SILGA U2887 shoe sole.  He would later state in a republished college text book that SILGA not only provided the shoe soles to Bruno Magli but to 20 other companies as well.  The construction of the shoe sole which has a raised heel prevents someone from accurately determining that the shoe print was left by the Bruno Magli brand of shoe.

21 thoughts on “AN ERRONEOUS O.J. LIE FOUND IN A SHOE PRINT”

  1. On the brannock scale my foot measure 10 1/2 inches, that means I wear a size 10 1/2 shoe All my shoes, the actual shoe-sole (shoe print) measure at least 12 1/4 inches. If OJ Simpsom wears a size 12 shoe that means on the brannock scale his foot measure 12 inches. His actual shoe sole (shoe print) would measure 13 + inches

    Like

    Reply

    1. Yours is a worthy observation, however, the point you are attempting to make is somewhat unclear. However, OJ Simpson’s foot does measure over 12 inches in fact the tracing that his doctor had him send to OMIG while in prison in Nevada in 2012 measures 12 and 1/16 inches. He told his sister to tell OMIG investigators that most of the shoes in his closet were size 13 shoes. The FBI agent, William Bodziak, who testified about the shoe prints incredibly stated that he was not granted a search warrant to go to Simpson’s house and examine the shoes in his closet and that the Reebok tennis shoe given him by the LAPD was “represented” to him as being OJ Simpson’s actual shoe even though the chain of custody regarding that Reebok shoe had been broken.

      The SILGA U2887 shoe sole sold to the Bruno Magli shoe brand for their Lorenzo model shoe measures 12 and 4/16 inches when attained by OMIG investigators from the Italian manufacturer SILGA GOMMA in 2000. Because the toe of that shoe sole is pointed, Mr. Simpson’s toes on his 12 and 1/16 inch foot extend beyond the perimeter of the toe of the shoe on both sides. This creates a dilemma that we are certain the FBI agent who testified knew as well as the detectives of the LAPD. The shoe sole that made the bloody shoe print in the sidewalk tiles at the murder site fell neatly inside of some of those tiles. When the question of whether anyone measured the dimensions of those tiles was asked by the Judge (Ito) and conveyed to the co-lead detective, Tom Lange, by prosecutor Marcia Clark, Lange immediately stated that the sidewalk tiles were 11 and 1/2 inches square. Hence, if Simpson’s toes stick out through the 12 and 4/16 inch alleged size 12 Bruno Magli Lorenzo model with the SILGA size 46/ alleged size 12 U2887 shoe sole attached, then it is highly unlikely that Simpson’s foot fit inside those SILGA U2887 shoe sole prints found inside the 11 and 1/2 inch sidewalk tiles at the Bundy murder site.

      The FBI agent, Bodziak, citing size, in our opinion, was being tricky with the public’s perception. Stating size is subjective and is not necessarily objectively accurate. Brannock was an American who invented a foot measuring scale in 1927 presumably based on American feet and the American English sizing system. However, the UK English sizing system often varies in size from the US English sizing system. Hence, a size 12 in the UK is not necessarily a size 12 in the US as noted on the British made Doc Marten Shoe boxes.

      What further complicates the voracity of what the FBI agent was conveying is that the SILGA U2887 shoe sole was given the size it used in the metric system of continental Europe and designated as being a size 46, which the FBI agent Bodziak alleged was a size 12. However, what size 12, a UK or a US size 12? Nevertheless, the size 12 that agent Bodziak stated made the shoe prints at the Bundy murder site, OJ Simpson’s foot as seen in the Maddogg blog does not fit in them. OMIG believes that agent Bodziak was simply acting falsely as what other FBI agents labeled as “Blue Flamers”. They were agents with no moral compass that would lie and invent false evidentiary testimony to assist state prosecutors in attaining convictions while aggrandizing the perception of their own status as preeminent FBI investigative agents. Whether the evidence actually did support a conviction or not was irrelevant to those willing to engage in such nefarious conduct.

      That is another side of the Simpson saga that had to be buried due to a deal cut between the Simpson lawyers and FBI top brass to keep an FBI agent they subpoenaed from taking the witness stand to testify against another FBI agent who had lied and committed perjury while under oath on the witness stand in the Simpson trial. They were given that description of being “Blaue Flamers” because just like the jet engine that rapidly accelerates and produces a burst of bright blue flame, it only lasts momentarily until it ultimately flames out altogether.

      Like

      Reply

  2. You are totally correct.

    William Blazini was the auction car buyer and the third to have seen no blood in the vehicle and bought thousands of vehicles per year, some he stated with blood in them.

    The first, was the tow truck driver, Bernie Deroux who was assigned to tow the Bronco from the street on Rockingham outside Simpson’s house, and he testified that he did not see any blood when inspecting the vehicle while hooking it up to be towed downtown to Viertel’s OPG (Official Police Garage).

    The Second, was the inside the yard tow truck driver, John Meraz, who towed the vehicle to its spot on the yard, since it was not taken to a secured area until after it was noted that Meraz has stolen documents out of Simpson’s Bronco’s glove compartment. He was charged with a criminal violation for doing so. Yet when questioned about seeing any blood when called to testify he stated that he saw no blood in the Bronco while in there rifling through papers.

    The third, Blazini, climbed in the vehicle specificially to see all the blood that the media had spoken of and as you point out in his testimony stated that he saw none.

    The fourth, was the police detective sent from the Police Commission, Kelly Muldorfer, after Meraz was charged with theft. She was sent to Viertels, which was supposedly designated as an OPG (Official Police Garage), to find out why a vehicle that supposedly was an important evidentiary factor in the Simpson case and trial had been unsecured and located for 2.5 months sitting available in the yard where anyone entering the yard had easy access to entering it. She testified that she got into the vehicle and saw no blood as well.

    So, what type of euphoric, narcosis effect has a hold on the public, especially so called professional investigative journalists, that they simply gloss over the credible witness’s testimony and preface their conversation with erroneous assertions such as “there was so much blood found in the Bronco”?

    The same effect takes place when the police detectives, Fuhrman and Lange, testified that there was no blood trail leading from the vehicle down the fence line where Simpson allegedly climbed over and dropped the glove. Also, the detectives testified there was no blood trail from the glove leading back towards the front gate. The air condition on the back of the guest house where Kato allegedly heard the thumps and where the glove was found is approximately 210 feet in, according to what Simpson told OMIG investigators when asked. It makes the blood supposedly found immediately inside the gate leading north and into the house suspicious as well, and according to the anonymous member of the LAPD talking to Stephen Singular in a Denver hotel room on August 01, 1994, all blood alleged was not to be trusted and should be tested for contamination.

    Like

    Reply

    1. This case was such an embarrassment to the prosecutors. Why they continued with the case after having all their so called evidence shoved down their throats is beyond me. I can only speculate that the DA’s goal was to stretch out the trial for as long as they could as the trail/evidence leading to the real killers grew cold.

      It’s a tragedy that OJ Simpson passed away before proving this case was a farce, rigged from the beginning.

      Like

      Reply

      1. O.J. could have been more proactive if he wanted to and poured hot coal on this fire long ago via OMIG, but he always gave us a tepid response and generally tied our hands while remaining privately angry. Hence, some of us at OMIG felt that beyond the farce of a double murder they may have been holding something else over his head that would have been even more damaging to him than simply ruining his professional career.

        When they gave you the Simpson case, it became a diversion they knowingly fed to this racially polarized society. A false narrative with antebellum racial undertones wrapped around the most insidious sociological myth. The idea that if he lost a white woman his fanatical infatuation and jealousy would drive him back into an inherent bestiality. That narrative is intoxicating, and intensively euphoric to the general public. Diverts their attention and makes them forget much more important matters than the Simpson case.

        One of the greatest events of genocide was taking place as the Simpson case got underway in 1994, and though the UN Commanders pleaded for assistance in staving off that catastrophe that killed almost one million people in the East African nation of Rwanda they said the US President ignored their pleas because they felt he along with everyone else was caught up with the “O.J. Simpson case”.

        The greatest act of domestic terrorism in the 2nd half of the 20th century occurred right in the middle of the Simpson trial in April of 1995, where two white men subsequently were convicted in murdering 168 men, women, and babies when they plotted and carried out the bombing of the Muir Federal Building in OKC. Though all of those who believe they know all about the Simpson case starting with who was in the Bronco during the infamous so called Bronco chase, could not if you asked give you the two convicted men who killed those 168 human beings with a man-made bomb of a van loaded with drums of nitrogen enriched fertilizer saturated with an inflammatory chemical igniting agent, i.e Jet fuel.

        The euphoric effect of the narrative seduces and neutralizes the senses or common sense and is as powerful as any addictive narcotic. So, to have something that powerful create a mass hysteria within the multi-million body politique of this nation creates other permutations to examine. One thing stands out as the possible reason for introducing such a major fraudulent diversion that excellent investigation has proven to have continuous hidden information in order to protect a valuable yet false narrative.

        Like

      2. Thank you for your well thought out response. The case was ridiculous. I like to watch “real crime” shows and it amazes me how many times these real life cases contradict the Simpson prosecution. In some cases there is no murder weapon or witnesses; while other times the time line contradicts investigators and they have to start all over again. In the Simpson case all of those issues contradicted the investigators but they just didn’t care. No murder weapon, no reasonable time line, no witnesses, just nothing and they went forward with the prosecution. And the media created half hour to one hour shows to help brainwash the public.

        I always thought of the public OJ Simpson as a very affable man when it came to crazy fans that wanted his picture, autograph, what ever it was they wanted. OJ Simpson seemed to be able to handle the irritation that came with being a public celebrity.

        I think it’s too bad he passed away while still be tainted by this phony criminal case.

        Like

      1. Gil Garcetti ……In a 1970 UPI identified lawyer Ira Reiner as a “friend” of Charles Manson.

        AND YOUR POINT IS?

        Like

  3. Sorry my point with Garcetti and Reiner is as DA’s of Los Angeles they seemed to help the occult when it came to certain public cases that shocked the public. As soon as the OJ case hit I would see Manson prosecutor Vince Bugliosi propped out on the airwaves to declare Simspon guilty and he was followed by Ira Reiner who the media used as another fake expert regarding Simpson’s guilt. In a recent episode of the Rich Eisen podcast where Gil Garcetti was helping to promote “OJ Simpson Made in America” Garcetti told Eisen he consulted with former President Jimmy Carter about the Simpson case. Now why in the world consult with Jimmy Carter? Well who can forget that Jimmy was Prez during some of the wildest murder cults in American history, from Jim Jones, to John Wayne Gacy, to Son of Sam, to the Atlanta Child Murders.

    Like

    Reply

    1. That is certainly interesting, however, those are bricks we at OMIG are going to allow you to toss from outside this organization. We simply stay within the realm of the evidence directly associated with the allegations of Simpson’s guilt that has been concealed from the public that OMIG investigators have continually uncovered often from inside sources within the LA County Justice Department. When finding out we know what they know and have been expected to involuntarily conceal they let OMIG investigators in the side doors to see for themselves, as they did with the multiple Glen Rogers’ files.

      That type of cooperation has now been going on approaching 30 years, and for the last 10, by former members of the FBI that filed investigative complaints with the Inspector General of the USDOJ due to internal malfeasance they encountered with corrupt agents testifying in the Simpson case to lean towards state prosecutors like Clark, but not exclusive to only L.A. However, in the Simpson case perjury under oath regarding attempted denial of contaminated blood associated with Simpson and blood of his ex-wife found on his socks thrown on the bedroom floor. Both it turns out was contaminated with EDTA, as Stephen Singular’s anonymous LAPD connect told him in August of 1994, 7 months before the Simpson trial began.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Your client OJ Simpson was a Scientologist, and so was Charles Manson. The lead prosecutor in the Simpson case was a Scientologist so was Charles Manson. One of the talking heads to come out of the Simpson trial bigger than she had been before “Greta”, she and her husband are Scientologists and so was Charles Manson. Simpson’s attorney Bob Shapiro not only represented Scientologist Dr. Bruce Roman in his shooting of Marcia Clarks first husband but he also represented Hollywood Director Bob Evans in the satanic Cotton Club murders. Evans also produced Rosemary’s Baby where future Simpson detractor the late Charles Grodin played the doctor in that movie. The murders on Bundy even resembled the murders from 1969 murders committed by Charles Manson’s mob.

        That the media rolled out Vince Bugliosi and Ira Reiner is not unusual seeing as how Bugliosis covered up the true motives and culprits in the gruesome Bundy like slasher murders in the Tate/LaBianca case; all while Ira Reiner represented Leslie Van Houten one of the Manson girls as well as being identified by United Press International as being a “friend” of Charles Manson. Even that jerkoff Phil Vanattar had been the arresting officer of Roman Pulanski the director of Rosemary’s Baby and the husband to Sharon Tate.

        There is no other explanation for the murders of Nicole and Ron. Sorry gents you have done an incredible job but the Mandingo narrative doesn’t wash. The Bundy killings were another Hollywood slasher killing and the main reason a relatively forgotten football star got all that media attention. The media or fake news as Trump calls it pulled out all stops to hide the truth behind the murder of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman.

        And that’s the reason Gil Garcetti called former President Jimmy Carter. Carter was connected to Jim Jones , John Wayne Gacy and the murders in his hometown called the Atlanta Child Murders.

        Thanks gents.

        Like

  4. I’m afraid the Mandingo narrative is more historical than the COS narrative as it relates to the Simpson case, since the binder that keeps it in the public pysche for 30 years, in our opinion, is the racial subtext. The COS narrative is somewhat of an esoteric and vague narrative that I think individuals like yourself may quickly absorb and can certainly promote with our blessing but to most people in the US it is abstract at best.

    However, the Mandingo narrative, as you have entitled is familiar and it has operated for centuries in the US in the dehumanizing of the black man, creating the psychic image in the Caucasian’s mind of him being a quasi-3/5th human being, an “Ab-original” being, (the Caucasian intelligentia maintaining the concept of Original man for themselves), the black savage, and outright beast.

    It was used as a propaganda fear tool of the pre-antebellum period in the US or English colonies prior to the beginning of the 19th century when plantation owners were getting rich. Defining black men and women as less than human beings in order to psychologically justify in the minds of whites the economic benefits of maintaining perpetual slavery and their black chattel property as bankable assets to be bought and sold at the whim of the slave masters.

    However, you outside OMIG can bring up the COS narrative, but we are not going to do it, other than possibly come behind you and ask whether given the duplicitous activity of former DDA Clark, that it might have been worthy of further investigation as to whether her former husband of Madame Clark was “accidentally” shot in the head by the same man from the COS who married her a second time to her second husband from the COS. It is OMIG’s understanding that Horowitz’s mother was not totally convinced of an accident when she came to the US to retrieve her human vegetable-turned son with brain trauma from that head shot, to take him home with her back to Israel.

    So, OMIG will be watching you make your argument and may chime in when it is suitable for them to do so. However, OMIG does not engage in all of the convoluted peripheral activity that is not clearly, directly or indirectly, closely associated with the Simpson case. In our opinion, most of those other titillating COS events have little directly or indirectly to do with the Simpson case. The fact that they have denigrated the whole African American community by challenging their intelligence to participate on an American jury as a result of the predominantly African American jury in the Simpson trial, is simply more of that Mandingo related madness that seduces the nation. However, the question will be asked publicly sooner or later is how did they empanel a 75% black jury in both a city and county whose black population is less than 10%. Even whites were a higher per centage representation within the jury pool for the Simpson case, 40% white vs 28% African American.

    Yet they did something that is suspiciously self-serving by empaneling a predominantly black jury so that they could redirect the public’s attention away from clandestine ongoing malfeasance of sworn court officers by focusing attention on the canard of OJ Simpson’s alleged guilt and the jury’s alleged anger with the white controlled justice system for acquitting him. This duck is now promulgated widely in the global arena of public opinion.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Dominick Dunne (Simpson poison pen) said early on in the trial that Paramount head and founder of the satanic church Temple of Set had dated Paula Barbieri. The double homicide at Bundy was likely a Manson type murder where high level members of the occult gave the orders to kill. Everywhere you look in the Simpson case you find Scientologists and former Manson prosecutors. OJ was charged with the crime in order to divert attention away from the real killers. That the trial dragged on is also an indication of “killing the clock” plus they were hoping for a mistrial where they could drag the case out another 2 to 3 years with no resolution.

      Temple of Set

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_Set

      FROM VARIETY 1995

      In his Variety piece he writes this.

      There’s always a lot to say about Paula Barbieri, who was O.J.’s last girlfriend before the slayings.

      Most Popular

      “Paula Barbieri visits O.J. in jail.”

      “Bob Evans knows Paula Barbieri.”

      “I heard that Paula Barbieri was with Michael Bolton at the Mirage in Vegas on the night of the murder.”

      “If Paula had been there, I bet Nicole would never have been killed that night. He didn’t have anyplace to go.”

      Like

      Reply

      1. We have little doubt, as you point out, that clandestine forces with internal secretive power to totally silence government figureheads in perceived authority probably greenlit this whole Simpson affair in 1994. OMIG believes under the aegis of a perceived need to regain the moral high ground that they appeared to have been losing in the wake of the 1991 Rodney King beating whose video tape was still circling the globe the Simpson narrative was selected. That 1991 event caught on tape by George Holliday, as well as the negative authoritative images of inequity to go along with the King video that sparked the widespread riots and fires throughout Los Angeles which emerged after the police responsible for the Rodney King beating were acquitted in a Ventura County trial in 1992 in the heavily police residential city of Simi Valley. These two things were consequential in promulgating the Simpson myth.

        However, those two events were, in our opinion, simply appetizers to a greater and potentially even more major embarrassment trying not to be revealed. The out-of-control governmental officials from the local police all the way up the ladder to high officials of both City, County and Federal agencies with their insatiable appetites, and greedy hands in a nasty pot of loot. The timing of the unprofessional police conduct and court cover up appeared to be about to potentially reveal high officials’ involvement in international cocaine trafficking that made Los Angeles now the central hub for attaining cheaper cocaine about half the price per kilo than what had traditionally been the higher price coming out of the Eastern hub of Miami, Florida. Therefore, serving the masses of the body politique of the US the familiar age-old wives’ tale and myth of the Negro gone feral behind his fanatical infatuation with a white woman was the most cost-effective and publicly believable lie to sell to create the diversion necessary to get the public to look away from an impending governmental disaster.

        The design of it could very well have originated from the source of which you contemplate. However, the grand narrative, which is an utterly false narrative was constructed around the perennial antebellum dehumanizing subliminal myth that the black man is not a human being but a beast. That as a result of that alleged fact he is dangerous to particularly white women and no matter how civilized he becomes he will always threaten to revert to his inherent bestiality when angered. This myth as a result of the Simpson case has become, in our opinion, a national security threat because it has exposed the soft underbelly of vulnerability to both your foreign and domestic adversaries to attack and effectively neutralize a nation. To do so with a seductively, cheap and cost-effective tool to weaponize, that being a false narrative with a particular subtext of racial animus. When you can neutralize the so called professional investigative journalists of the mainstream press from failing to do any meaningful due diligence regarding the plethora of irregularities in evidence associated with this infamous Simpson case, you know you have a beneficial invaluable weapon to utilize.

        This “Mandingo” theory as has been opined; we believe was the foundation of the myth that Domminick Dunne based his allegations of Simpson’s guilt in a publicly popular Vanity Fair article in 1995. Upon attending along with scions of great wealth an operatic performance of the Shakespearean tragedy Othello, Dunne proclaimed in his article that he and the other members of the entourage had experienced the same simultaneous epiphany at the same moment when the play reached that part, of the African Moorish Commander of the European Venetian Brigades, Othello, out of his fanatically driven jealousy murdering his wife Desdemona. VOILA! According to Dunne this was OJ SIMPSON and his ex-wife NICOLE!

        In 1997, the Brown’s attorney Merrit McKeon told OMIG investigators that the neighbors of Lou Brown told him “that’s what you get for allowing your daughter to marry a N-word”. They did not say for allowing your daughter to marry an insane person, or a fanatically jealous individual. I can only assume if the alleged murderer had been white, they would have qualified it and added more clarification to their denunciation of Lou Brown for such an allowance. However, no they said the obvious of what has emerged if merely now subliminally in the minds of so many to be the myth surrounding black men that they will revert to an inherent bestial nature if angered, and particularly regarding the loss of the white man’s most valuable possession, the only thing that can make him white, a white woman.

        Though I respect your investigative due diligence in regard to events related to the COS, that connection is not the narrative that stands out to OMIG investigators albeit potentially true, however, the Mandingo narrative that was coined stands out brilliantly.

        Like

      2. I just disagree with you as to motive but think all the evidence and proof you

        have uncovered prove beyond a doubt OJ Simpson was innocent and the killers are still out in the public.

        Like

  5. The only motive that was sufficient enough in our opinion to warrant a false narrative of this magnitude rising to a level of exposing a national security threat due to the mass hysteria nationally it caused is one of the permutations that stands out like a sore thumb. One that was a continuously dripping revelation of CIA, state, county, and city officials turning a blind eye while keeping their hands in the illicit narcotics trafficking business that made them millions under the aegis of supporting the Nicaraguan Contra rebels against the Sandinista Government while justifying the spreading of misery throughout the US by introducing crack cocaine to the masses into the cities that it would debilitate.

    I don’t believe that the alleged concealing of murder by those associated with the COS reached a level of magnitude necessary to redirect the attention of the mass public for almost 30 years and block out the memory of arguably more important events than the Simpson murder case.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Another incredible clip from the amazing prosecution of OJ Simpson. In this video clip the associate buyer from the retail chain Bloomingdale testifies that he doesn’t recall selling Bruno Mali shoes to OJ Simpson and was adamant that he would never “suggest” OJ Simpson buy such a shoe for wear in Buffalo NY.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Absolutely, we remember this testimony, with common sense he would not recommend Simpson buying this $200 dress casual shoe because the Bruno Magli Lorenzo model shoe, is a high-top shoe, that consists largely of suede. If you go to another Maddogg post regarding the unlikelihood of Simpson’s foot fitting in the alleged size 12 shoe, you will see that he is wearing a rain trench coat due to the rainy, drizzly, windy weather conditions during that game on Sept. 26, 1993. You could see many of the people in the stands with umbrellas open, and rain gear on, with Dick Enberg stating during the first 40 seconds that it has rained all day and all night and was still raining at game time with wind gusts of 60 MPH.

        That footage contradicts both the image of Simpson walking across the endzone wearing Bruno Magli Lorenzo shoes on a partly sunny day it appears with no raincoat, which is how he appears in the Harry Scull photo. Scull under deposition testimony, stated that he could not remember the weather conditions on that day. His photo, he states, was taken between noon and 12:30 PM on that game day and it clashes with the other photo supposedly taken that day by E.J. Flammer of Simpson standing with members of the Buffalo Bills Monday Morning QBs Club. He, Flammer, claimed he took his photos around 10:30 AM that same game day at the stadium.

        First of all, you cannot distinguish what kind of shoes Simpson is wearing in Flammer’s photo, and they certainly do not appear to be the Bruno Magli Lorenzo model shoe in some of Flammer’s photos.

        Secondly, in the Flammer photo it appears that Simpson is wearing a boutonniere handkerchief in his left breast pocket and their Monday Morning QB club pin in his left lapel of the sport coat he is wearing. Neither the pin nor the handkerchief in the E.J. Flammer photo appears two hours later in the Harry Scull photo.

        The Scull Photo of Simpson walking across the endzone also had its negatives out of Scull’s control for a significant period of time and allegedly were left on a Concord flight where they wound up in Great Britain, a locale noted for its tabloid journalism newspapers and photo manipulation. Those negatives gone allegedly for six months before returning to Harry Scull’s control six months later but in time for Scull’s deposition testimony for the Simpson Civil trial.

        Hence, this video clip would be an excellent counter narrative in a documentary highlighting all of those things as well heretofore stated above.

        Like

Leave a comment