T
MaddoggBrown’s Guest Writer, OMIG Investigator Euclien Prentice
It dawned on us that we may need to help our chairman of the Ocean Medical Investigative Group-OMIG, Dr. Henry S. Johnson, out by coming to his aid after a bunch of scared bunnies on CNN, anchored by Martin Savage, this past Sunday morning October 01, 2017, were doing everything they could to cut him off the air. He would not fall into the trap of their cookie cutter narrative of what’s OJ Simpson going to do now that he’s been freed from prison? Dr. Johnson pretty much told them the hell with what Simpson is going to do in the future, he’d received his marching orders from Simpson and they were to continue to pursue and press authorities for the return of those phone records removed from his case file that could have exonerated him from this perennially public hedonic scorn as well as the murder trial itself.
This present wrangle between Dr. Johnson, OMIG’s chief medical investigator, OMIG started out as the Ocean Medical Investigative Group but as more irregularities in evidence came in to their offices regarding the Simpson case the boundaries of OMIG expanded. This dispute about time is crucial and it started with a discrepancy found by Johneon’s field investigators at OMIG relative to the time that the mother of Nicole Brown Simpson actually arrived home with her family to their residence in Dana Point, Orange County after leaaving the tawny L.A. enclave of Brentwood.
The Brown’s residence was 72 miles down the I-405 freeway at Monarch Bay, Dana Point, Orange, County. The Browns left the Mezzaluna at approximately “08:45-ish” after the last supper they had with their daughter, Nicole Brown Simpson, according to waitress Tia Gavin and three other employees who served the Brown party. However, attorneys after wrangling behind closed doors began to change the original phone call between Juditha Brown and Nicole from 11PM back 43 minutes the first time to 10:17 PM on July 08, 1994 and finally a full hour and a half back to 09:37 PM on February 07, 1995 the fourteenth day of the Simpson trial. Below is the in-chambers certified trial transcript of Arnella Sims the court reporter in Judge Kathleen Kennedy Powell’s chambers on that day, July 08, 1994. In this case, it was Shapiro offering the change of the time from 11 PM back to 10:17 PM. By February 1995, it would be the prosecution offering 09:37 PM as the initial time of the last phone call from Juditha Brown back to Brentwood from Dana Point, and Nicole led by deputy D.A. Marcia Clark in a poster-board entitled Exhibit 35.
This alleged phone record at the top of this page we believe is a fake, and we’d wager that no one receives a telephone bill with call lines that look like the one above. Due to its irregular type sizes across the multiple call lines and the illegibility of the type makes a number of call lines undecipherable and unintelligible. Who receives something as raggedy and unprofessional as this corporate document, except a valium induced O.J. by slick lawyers passing it off on Simpson in the OJ Simpson trial? No one that we know receives a phone record from their company that comes to them with such a ragged appearance, but this is what lawyers in the Simpson trial passed off as being truthful.and is something we received from Louis Brown, Nicole Brown Simpson’s father after repeatedly telling him the problems that it created before he’d sent it.
This discussion occurred with Brown after he reneged on allowing OMIG investigators to receive the actual record from the legal archive department of GTE communications in San Angelo, Texas back in 1999. After waiting an additional 6 weeks Brown received them from the man who had secretly absconded with them from the Simpson case file, Los Angeles County deputy D.A. William Hodgeman. So, this is what the big stir is about that Dr. Henry S. Johnson’s and his OMIG investigators won’t let up when invited on any of the network news shows to discuss OJ Simpson’s general welfare. They find a way to flip the script and bring it back to the original narrative of where are the actual phone records removed from Simpson’s case file that will either affirm their position that the Brown family could not drive between Brentwood, Los Angeles to Dana Point, Orange County in a 45 minute window of time. Even the lead detectives, Lange and Vannatter said the same in their book EVIDENCE DISMISSED. They wrote on page 28 that the Brown family lived a minimum of 90 minutes south of Brentwood (Los Angeles).
Well if that is so then how could the Browns depart Brentwood as testimony claims at approximately 08:45 PM and arrive at their home in Dana Point in time to make a 09:37 PM final phone call back to Brentwood’s Mezzaluna Restaurant and then two minutes later to their daughter Nicole Brown Simpson at 09:39 PM. This was literally the beginning of the last phone calls before Nicole was murdered. However, 09:37 PM changed the original phone time given by the mother and father on two separate occasions right after the murders took place of making the last call to Nicole at approximately 11PM. Shapiro a month later would offer 10:17 PM as an offer of compromise it appears, and subsequently, Marcia Clark would offer 09:37 PM on a posterboard seven months later in February 1995 during the Simpson criminal trial. Below is a video clip of what the highway volume looked like on the I-405 the night the Brown family left for their residence in Dana Point. Their seaside community at Monarch Bay had to maintain an average traffic speed from door to door of 72 MPH in order to reach home 72 miles away within an hour and a higher speed if in 45 minutes. Anytime as in this clip the traffic speed fell below 72 MPH they had to add the difference on top of 72 MPH. Where you see traffic poking along below at possibly 30 MPH near Brentwood it would require adding 42 MPH +72 MPH requiring the Brown vehicle to travel at a rate of speed of 114 MPH for a distance equal to this 8 mile slow down below.
Read further into the OMIG investigation via Amazon Books where you will find these.
maddoggbuttkickingbrown's real truth! 
Thanks for posting all of this!
On the “CNN’s Racisim” video, I found this interesting comment: “Those records were locked away and can not be accessed for 75 years. ” Do you know if this is true?
Also, yesterday I listened to an audio with Donald Freed, author of Killing Time (posted here: https://miketgriffith.com/files/recommendedaudio.htm), and he said that Nicole and Ron both saw the same therapist and that her office was broken into and that she was later stalked and threatened that she better not talk about the OJ case. I have no idea what that was about, but I thought it was very interesting.
I also saw some strange but kind of interesting info on the OJ case from Sherman Scholnick–I’m not sure what to make of his information, but he seems to suggest that the DEA was following Nicole and Ron and had information about the murders.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Regarding the phone records being locked away for 75 years was that a respondent’s comment? I’ve heard it mentioned before and that it was assigned to Dick Gregory, point us to the link so we can check it out.
(1.)–The only thing I can comment on is what we at OMIG have experienced because if it is an odd activity we at lease attempt to keep some evidence of it, such as the Ron Goldman docket sheet, since they certainly did not wanted us examining the inside of his case file. Had it been about two inches slimmer T.H. Johnson said it could have fit through the clerk office in Malifbu CA customer service window. The Asian fellow he talks about was stuffing and he was trying to pull but it was too thick to go through. It was when they buzzed him into the ante room that the Asian fellow apparently looked into the file and asked his supervisor and she told him that file was off limits. Johnson would later be introduced to California Government Code sec. 6254(f) by Clerk Office Mangaer, Ann Madden, who pleaded with him to not make her the bad guy because the law governed it, and that law prevents anyone’s records from public examination when they are acting as cooperating confidential informants. So he could not attain access to the interior of the file but he kept the docket sheet for that case file 91C00362 People V. Ronald Lyle Goldman.
(2.) –My understanding is that the psychologists office that both Ron and Nicole used had been broken into, that has come up in a number of books.
(3.) –If I remember Sherman may have been the investigator who revealed the Marvin Glass Illinois connection and that besides facing the criminal RICO charges, Glass stood trial for attempted murder. However, he was acquitted when his henchmen, Jack Kurat and DeCicco, began to allegedly contradict themselves concerning Glass’s involvement in hiring them to shoot Glass’s law partner Pritzker in the head. We interviewed Glass’s son and he said that Fred Goldman was abusive and used to beat he and his brother and knocked him down a flight of stairs while he was on crutches. He seemed pissed with his mother for continuing to support Fred, because Fred attempted to beat his dad while in a wheel chair and the kid jumped across his father’s lap and took the beating according to his email responses to OMIG to protect his father who was by then going down due to AIDS. He’d avoid the 210 year RICO sentence because Glass too became a confidential informant and though Fred acknowledges that he was in LA at the time of Ron’s death in his book, HIS NAME IS RON, he manages to not speak his name over 8 times in the book. Then Fred lied and called him a retired defense attorney when the judge took his license to practice law when he sentenced him to 8 years in federal prison.
LikeLike
Wow! Thank you so much for all of your information.
On the comment about the records being sealed for 75 years, when I watched the “CNN’s Racism: Dr. Henry S. Johnson Was Cut Off After Exposing Phone Records From O.J.’s 95′ Trial” here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlBulfNmRdc I scrolled down to read comments and “Memphite Theology” said “Those records were locked away and can not be accessed for 75 years. That Goldman jew is Satan incarnate” (maybe they were just exaggerating).
It’s great that Porkins Policy Radio and Opperman report have had Stephen Singular, T. H. Johnson, Pat McKenna and Brian Heiss on their shows to get the truth out, but that’s not enough. I’m going to start writing to other internet radio hosts and try to get them to start getting the truth out. I think there are a lot of people out there who realize the MSM lies to us (e.g. Iraq WMD), and who are willing to go back and look at things on their own. We just need more independent radio hosts to be willing to look at this.
LikeLike
Hello Amanda, there’s a movie that’s supposed to come out this year called Nicole and OJ starring Boris Kodjoe and directed by Joshua Newton. I’ve read it’s going to include all the information the media has suppressed and lied about this case/trial for the last 25 years. If you look up the movie’s cast there’s an actor listed who will be playing Brett Cantor.
LikeLike
Yes, Josh Newton has been attempting to produce his version of the movie on the Simpson matter for the last 6-7 years, certainly, before Ryan Murphy’s 7-week series American Crime Story appeared on the Cable Network. I know it’s been that length of time since Newton first made contact with OMIG (Ocean Medical Investigative Group’s) top officers in L.A. However, he came back to them and proclaimed that he could not present the true narrative that centers around OMIG’s top investigators who continue to uncover these documents of malfeasance because they are black. He alleged that he could not attain the financing to produce his movie because no one would believe that black investigators made these discoveries regarding the concealed evidence hidden to protect the false narrative in the OJ Simpson case. We saw one or his first trailers and it had OMIG’s chairman called Doc (meaning Dr. Henry S. Johnson) concealed as a hidden shadow talking to a white attorney, presumably OMIG’s former hired lawyer for the Simpson matter named Doug McCann. I think Newton has attempted to complete the last production in Bulgaria that features Boris Kodjoe and the female playing Nicole Brown Simpson.
LikeLike
Excellent, from us we salute you. Please proceed and do so, you have our blessing.
LikeLike
@MADDDOGGBUTTKICKINGBROWN
Thank you for that info. That’s disappointing if true but I am not surprised. I knew he was in communication with you guys during the early stages. Is there anything more you can share about your interactions with him? Curious if he’s going to include some of the information your website has been talking about in his movie.
It’s possible he may changed the script of the movie because on the movie’s IMDB page there is no characters listed as Doc or Doug McCann. It’s supposed to release at some point this year but I’m not sure when. I do know there was a screening for it in Universal Studios last year. I also received info that most of it was filmed in Bulgaria but not all of it was. I do hope it finally comes out this year and is able to find an audience. It’s been a couple year’s since the FX series and ESPN doc came out, and it’s about time a project tells the other side of the OJ case/trial.
LikeLike
I haven’t seen a new trailer but only photo images of Boris Kodjoe and a blonde female as Nicole posing seductively together. I don’t know if that is even the same woman he was planning to use a few years back, a woman from England who was introduced by Josh on one of the tabloid shows, i.e. TMZ, etc. That’s when he was attempting to get his movie completed before Ryan Murphy’s series was scheduled to air. OMIG no longer gets bent out of shape behind how the story is told, since three of them now have presented the alleged “other side” of the OJ case, four counting the ESPN documentary of Ezra Edleman “OJ: Made in America”. They all are produced, IMO, with too much ego and less actual facts and they all end with OJ being thrown under the bus in order to get a platform for distribution in the US. They all, however, have come to OMIG’s door prior to production and asked for our involvement but OMIG rarely becomes involved in anything involving this matter that it doesn’t control the final editing. That is due to what they have seen in the past regarding market realities including British producer David Monaghan’s “My Brother the Serial Killer”, Ezra Edelman’s and his producers’ “OJ: Made in America”, the real let down of Norman Pardo’s messy madness of “Who Killed Nicole” and finally Josh Newton’s last entitled “OJ and Nicole”. The unbelievable proclamation that is a common denominator with all of these guys, or at least two, Newton and Pardo, who have attempted to suck tons of details from OMIG investigators is their remark “I know what really happened”. We laugh because we know that none of them have been in those trenches like OMIG’s investigators have for the last 23 years or they wouldn’t be standing in our office making such proclamations and producing such fraudulent schlock. However, the truth for them seems to be up against a deadline and markteing realities so our position is “C’est la vie”; however, we don’t have to participate in it. ——————————————————————————————————————————————–They all have a little taste of OMIG in them though, Norman Pardo has the green foot tracing of OJ and the blue foot tracing of Glen Roger’s overlaid on top of the SILGA U2887 size 46/size 12 shoe sole he got from OMIG in one of his background shots while sitting at the table talking to his people. Glen’s foot fits easily within the boundaries of that shoe sole found on the bottom of the Bruno Magli Lorenzo model shoe, OJ’s toes and foot protrude outside the boundaries of that shoe sole. Hidden case file 97-222, a civil service greivance transcript offered by a managing deputy DA of the Van Nuy’s office, sealed by Judge John Reid in November 1997 indicates Glen’s alleged intimate involvement with Simpson’s ex-wife, Nicole.
———————————————————————————————————————————–That reality presents a new era of discoveries on how a couple of rogue FBI agents aligned with the fraud perpetrated by the LADA and LAPD to frame Simpson. That discovery by OMIG which started with examining the crime scene photos of the shoe prints inside the 11 and 1/2 inch side walk tiles at Nicole’s condo has brought former FBI agents who saw the shoe demonstration in OMIG’s SERPENTS RISING https://amazon.com/Serpents-Rising-Independent-Investigation-J/dp/B0046Z2M9M and came to OMIG’s door with about 53 pounds of documents they stored for the last 25 years. The documents show that the FBI sent their representative to negotiate to keep other FBI agent from taking the witness stand who had filed a complaint with the USDOJ-Inspector General on behalf of other special agents in the FBI laboratory. That complaint was regarding another agent committing perjury relative to the blood of Simpson found allegedly at the crime scene and blood found on socks thrown on the floor of Simpson’s bedroom. The FBI lab scientists were asked in Feb. 1995 to disprove an allegation of contaminated blood that had come from an anonymous LAPD insider via a Denver, Colorado based author Stephen Singular in August of 1994, that the blood was not to be trusted. The anonymous insider told Singular to take that information to Simpson’s defense team at the very beginning of the case that blood swatches number 47 (the gate) and swatch number 48 and blood found on the socks was blood planted at the crime sites from a blood collection vial lined with a highly concentrated preservative called EDTA. The lead detective, Vannatter, had collected both Simpson’s blood vial and the blood vials of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson from the coroner’s office. The actual FBI lab scientists found the blood they were asked to examine was contaminated with that highly concentrated compound of EDTA. However, their unit chief, Roger Martz, absconded with their research results and took them back to his office and modified the results to aligh with the state Prosecutors case against Simpson. The FBI agents who did the research came to another and protested when their unit chief stole and changed their results and wrote a fraudulent letter to the LADA’s office denying that there was any EDTA found in the blood. Then lied after being called to the witness stand and continuing to commit perjury under oath. That is when these other agents cajoled another whose career had already been damaged for filing over a hundred such complaints regarding the unprofessional conduct within the FBI Lab with the Inspector General. He filed the complaint found in US DOJ-OIG Case file 9403575 that the FBI and OIG has continued to attempt to hide from OMIG’s FOIA requests. The OIG (Office of the Inspector General) had to notify Simpson’s defense team in 1995 after they received the complaint. However, the top brass of the Agency did not want their FBI brand sullied in this widely publicized trial so they sent their top general counsel to Los Angeles to negotiate with the prosecution to keep the other FBI agent whose name the complaint was filed in off the witness stand testifying about another FBI agent who had changed the blood results and lied about arguably the most crucial evidence in the Simpson case, the blood.
LikeLike
I meant to say, the FBI sent their top general counsel to negotiate with the Defense team’s Johnnie Cochran we presume, to keep the Defense from putting the FBI agent Martz they had subpeonaed on the witness stand. I did not mean to say that the general cousel negotiated with the prosecution.
LikeLike
I hope my reply sent.
LikeLike
Let me try one more time. I have watched Serpents Rising and have listened to several interviews with TH Johnson on the Ed Opperman show. You guys have done a lot of good work and I learned a lot about this case from your work.
I talked to people who worked on Nicole and O.J. film and they said it was halfway complete and still needed to shoot more. The completed half screened at Universal Studios last year. I don’t think the film will release anymore in light of the controversy surrounding the lead actress Charlotte Kirk, as well as allegations that Joshua Newton tried to extort Ron Meyer. Not sure if you guys have been following this story. I’m not trying to praise Newton because I know based on your posts he attempted to whitewash Nicole and O.J., but I think this whole situation is really unfortunate. I think Nicole and O.J. had the potential to shed light on the lesser known trial evidence and facts of the case, as well as the drug connections. For that reason I still hope it releases one day even though things aren’t looking good right now. Court TV’s OJ25 series recently did a good job of telling the truth about the trial, and I encouraged Stephen Singular to produce a documentary about his involvement in the trial. He’s planning to update Legacy of Deception in the wake of George Floyd’s murder and the BLM protests.
LikeLike
Yes, Singular has informed the OMIG Investigative Team Coordinator, T.H. Johnson, of his intent to produce an updated version of LEGACY. We applaud any and all who help in the heavy lift to hoist the heavy blanket that has covered this fraud for so long. Glad you stay informed…. Kudos from The Maddogg Staff at Maddogg Central.
LikeLike
Love what you guys are doing. We joined a facebook group called “ OJ Simpson Not Guilty but Liable”
Respectable site every now then it’s get kind of crazy. A while back there was a online radio program from Washington DC interviewing Doctor Johnson. He stated that LA fire department engine 19 recorded Nicole time of death a quarter to 12, is the public record and if so how can I access it
Thanks
L.G.
LikeLike
We encourage you to reach out to Dr. Henry Johnson, Chairman of OMIG (Ocean Medical Investigative Group) at his Face Book page, https://www.facebook.com/henry.s.johnson.37 since that information as we remember came to our attention about 20 years ago. He and another staff member’s where approached while promoting his book at a Los Angeles Book Festival. The staff member and Dr. Johnson who was promoting his book Double Crossed for Blood back around 2001 when it was first published was approached by one of the EMTs that was on duty at that Engine 19 Fire Dept that was called shortly after the bodies were discovered. I cannot remember the time that Dr. Johnson cited as to when the EMT said they examined the bodies, since I thought they arrived after midnight. So I am not going to quote that time you cite above. The only thing we can remember is that Doc told us that he was told that the bodies were still warm indicating that the murders may have taken place much later than the time the prosecution cited since the bodies would have been closer to the ambiant temperature of the ground and surrounding cooler air at the time.
LikeLike
based on the dog’s incessant barking we already know when she was murdered…. it was in/ or around 1030-40, maybe 15 mins earlier than that cuz pable fenves said that is when he heard the dog. So if we have established that, the phone call of Juditha could not have been at 11pm. Although driving that distance in less than hour is unusual.. What is the latest the phone call could be to exonerate OJ? If the phone call was at 1017, does that exonerate OJ? HOw about the witnesses at mezzalunna who took the phone call? Did they doctor their testimony to fit the narrative? I believe the asst manager/bartender Karen Crawford said she did take the call at 940.. Was she lying? She testified at the prelim. hearing but I dont think she was at trial.
LikeLike
Oh, so you and Pablo studied dog language in college did you and they taught you and Pablo how to translate dog bark into the English language, did they?
So, professor, did the dog show you and Pablo a photo of the time he took on his doggy Rolex between 10:30 and 10:40 PM? According to the testimony, professor, there were several dogs barking in and around the block that Nicole lived on that night and several being walked that evening. You people are so silly drawing an affirmative conclusion based upon when dogs began barking at night. However, I guess that dogs barking is par for the course when people are seduced by a false narrative with subtle but powerful racial undertones. Those kind of people like you are hellbent on conducting a public lynching and dispensing with a defendant’s basic constitutional rights.
Furthermore, you haven’t provided anything substantive to rebut OMIG’s traffic data of traffic conditions on the I-405 freeway at that time of night in order to establish that Juditha Brown could not have made the phone call at 11PM. All you have cited is Pablo’s statement of when a dog talked to him, I guess by phone since Pablo nor anyone else came out to see why dogs were barking. Lou Brown stated Juditha talked to Nicole at 11PM on the night Nicole was killed. Juditha is alleged in Shapiro’s book on page 33 to have told him that she called Nicole at approximately 11PM. F. Lee Bailey stated on the CBS Morning Show on June 27, 1994 that they had evidence that Nicole was on the phone talking to her mother at 11 PM. Furthermore, the traffic data provided to Dr. Henry Johnson’s OMIG investigative team by CALTrans traffic engineers indicates traffic volumes and density between 8-9PM on June 12, 1994 rivaled the highest work week rush hour traffic volumes that would have caused the Brown family to arrive home at the far end of Orange County between one and a half and two hours after an 8:30 or 8:45 PM departure. Do you have anything else to offer to support your supposition and conclusion of why Juditha could not have made the phone call to Nicole at approximately 11PM besides you and Pablo’s conversation with dogs barking? You two clowns don’t know why dogs were barking at one another in the Bundy drive neighborhood though speculating is allowed it certainly is nothing conclusive to offer as testimony in a capital murder trial.
The phone call was alleged on July 8th 1994 by Bob Shapiro in Judge Kathleen Kennedy Powell’s chambers to have been at 10:17 PM and he attempted to offer it as a stipulation and pull back from pushing 11PM during the preliminary hearing. Marcia Clark refused to accept the stipulation proffered by Shapiro. The time of 10:17 PM was reported to the New York Daily Newspaper the following day July 9th 1994 allegedly by someone close to the phone records that it was made by Juditha to the Mezzaluna at 10:17 PM and would have ended at 10:28 PM which still would not have given OJ enough time to murder two people and drive home in time to catch his limo to LAX. If the Mezzaluna was under surveillance for drug distribution as allegedly it was along with other food establishments where the rich and well to do could score their drugs, then yes, we believe that Karen Crawford was willing to lie and attest to an alleged impossible time of the phone call coming in at around 9:30 to 9:40 PM.
LikeLike
i heard nicole called around 10: 45 to talk with ronald goldman at mezuluna this timeline sounds about right. because her mom told coroner claudine ratcliffe she last spoke to her daughter at 11:00 pm. that means ron left work around 10: 45 or later.
LikeLike
It appears they have a lot to hide knowing Simpson is innocent with those phone records . The truth is a threat to the media as they made so much money and ratings off of the O.J. Simpson is guilty at all cost narrative. Time could not allow one person do these crimes . The forensic evidence shows there was more than person with unmatched fingerprints, DNA , and other shoe prints . Remember the envelope and Goldman’s genes had tale tale signs of another shoe imprint. Ron Goldman’s knuckles showed significant defensive wounds that he fought valiantly and Simpson had a mere glass cut no bruises or signs of trauma .
LikeLike
both ron and nicole had multiple cuts and and bruises on both hands. OJ had one small cut compare to ron and nicole. they did check out OJ body and he had NO CUTS scrapes or bruises!!
LikeLike
WTF? The video of the traffic was not shot on June 12, 1994. It was on a Thanksgiving of a much more recent year.
All you had to do was to go to Google Maps and see how long a typical trip between Mezzaluna and Dana Point would take on a typical Sunday starting at around 8:30. It would take 65 minutes — the Browns would arrive home at around 9:35, in time for Judy’s call to Mezzaluna which the phone records showed to be at 9:37. Look at the transcripts.
And why would Shapiro “compromise” by arriving at 10:17 (an oddly specific time)? If the sealed phone records that he was able to see said 11:00, which would potentially completely exonerate OJ, why would he compromise? He clearly stated that it was at 10:17, and Marcia Clark was like, “It said that? Okay then…” They weren’t in dispute.
LikeLike
What a clownish remark “ALL YOU HAD TO DO WAS TO GO TO GOOGLE MAPS TO SEE WHAT A TYPICAL TRIP WOULD TAKE BETWEEN THE MEZZALUNA AND BRENTWOOD ON A TYPICAL SUNDAY STARTING AROUND 8:30 PM–IT WOULD TAKE 65 MINUTES”.
Not on Sunday, June 12, 1994, departing Brentwood between 8-9PM, Benny Wenny, and that’s according to the traffic engineers from Caltrans who told us it could not have happened after seeing the arguments we were waging in 2000 in the USDC in the Central District of CA to compel GTE to replace the phone records removed from the Simpson exhibit department case file. When a few of them saw the cable bantering discussions they told us (OMIG) (Ocean Medical Investigative Group) why it did not and could not happen and on that evening and sent us the confirming proof as to why it could not.
1st. The traffic volumes on the I-405 SB freeway were rivaling the highest peak hour of the normal Monday-Friday work week in the high 80s and above 90 per cent at the I-10/I-405 intersection.
2nd. The traffic at the intersection of the I-10 and I-405 based on the high per centage of traffic at that junction was causing virtually a traffic standstill or utterly slow movement through that zone of congestion.
3rd. There was no completed HOV system at that time in June of 1994, since it was just year two of that five-year construction project from 1993-1998 when it was completed. BTW, that situation was creating its own problem with the 15-mile HOV construction zone to the south straddling L.A. County and Orange County causing a bottle necking at that juncture while simultaneously creating a bottle necking effect back to the North.
4th. the CA-73 Highway, the toll road, through the San Joaquin Mountains in Orange County was still under construction and would not be completed until 1996. I suspect some of your GOOGLE MAP assumption factors in that highway CA-73 since you suggested 65 minutes. Unfortunately, CA-73 if in your presumption, does not help bolster your assumption as to how fast the Brown family could have arrived home in 1994 since the CA-73 was not operable or ready for travel down that system yet, until 1996, or two years after the 1994 murder case.
5th. Due to the lack of an HOV lane system the average speed in the data Caltrans traffic engineers provided us from Sunset Blvd to Marine Ave 16 miles south, according to the Caltrans documents provided to OMIG was approximately 29 mph. It would increase to 59 MPH after the completion of the HOV lane system in 1998. Our calculations had the speed in that speed range as well but slightly slower still. So, finding that Caltrans had already attained the calculations to determine average daily speed through that zone before HOV Lane completion was gratifying to know.
6th. However, the Browns back then due to the highway constraints lived approximately 72 miles away from the Mezzaluna, down the I-405 and I-5 and thus would have had to maintain an average speed of 72 mph from door to door to arrive there in an hour in 1994. Anything below 72 MPH as the difference had to be added on top of 72 MPH for the same distance to stay within that average 72 MPH time frame. So hypothetically that would have the Brown family traveling for at least 16 miles at a rate of 115 MPH (72MPH+43MPH). With two infant children in the car we doubt that the Browns did that.
In Re: to Shapiro- – He made that remark at approximately 12:05 PM in the preliminary hearing judge Kathleen Kennedy Powell’s chambers, on July 8, 1994, the last day of the preliminary hearing when she asked was there any more crucial issues that either side wanted to offer. That is when Shapiro stated (according to the court transcript) that he wanted to proffer the stipulation that the final phone call came in at 10:17 PM. When Marcia Clark was asked by the Judge was that acceptable to the People she demurred and said that she didn’t know what the actual time was and would have to check. Shapiro then told her he was talking about the phone records she showed in open court on the first day of the preliminary hearing that said GTE on the envelope she was waving. Judge Powell stated that she was going to seal that aspect of the in chambers transcript until they reached a mutual agreement as to what the time of the last phone call was. When the preliminary afternoon session got under way Shapiro began to browbeat Dr. Irwin Golden about hearing of an 11 PM telephone conversation between Mother and daughter. However, Deputy DA Bill Hodgman would object, and Judge Powell would sustain the objection. It would not come up again for another 7 months until Feb. 7, 1995, the 14th day of the Simpson trial when Shapiro would sheepishly stipulate to the 09:37 PM phone time on the Exhibit 35 posterboard alleged to be the Juditha Brown phone record.
Why Shapiro engaged in that act of chicanery or why others on the defense team would do so, is still quite a mystery that even though we have our speculations as to why based upon factor analysis at OMIG, we see no major benefit at this time sharing those trails of ideas with those of you still imbibing the euphoria of this narcotic known as the Simpson narrative. Whereby it is not based on any empirical evidence since all of that is in conflict but simply on the narrative of his involvement in domestic abuse. However, domestic abuse is not the sole predicate evidence of murder, you must have the empirical evidence and all of the empirical evidence is in conflict or just like these phone records you came on debating about have been removed by court action from public examination.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“If the sealed phone records that he was able to see said 11:00, which would potentially completely exonerate OJ, why would he “Shapiro” compromise?”
Excuse me for failing to provide a response to what had always been a perplexing question to OMIG as well as to others like yourself that you asked above. We asked that question as malfeasance continued to be uncovered repeatedly over the years regarding this case. The question was on our mind as far back as early 1998. Why would Shapiro compromise and go along with concealing potentially exculpatory evidence?
When you analyze the aggressive posturing of Shapiro which seems to stand out boldly in the transcript transcribed in Judge Kathleen Kennedy Powell’s chambers on July 8, 1994, at the end of the Pre-lims, he appears leonine when proffering a 10:17 PM stipulation to Marcia Clark of the final phone call back to Brentwood’s Mezzaluna from Dana Point, the alleged first of those final calls.
Then your scroll forward 7 months to February 07, 1995 and when he offers in open court to stipulate to the time on the EXHIBIT 35 POSTERBOARD of allegedly Juditha Brown’s phone records, showing a 09:37 PM phone call that Clark is talking to Mezzaluna employee Karen Crawford about, Shapiro is almost inaudible when offering to stipulate. The only thing audio-wise that was clear was his alibi “since this witness cannot confirm what the actual times were we will offer to stipulate to the time”. In February of 1995, I doubt that anyone really was focused on the time factor to travel between Brentwood and Dana Point. However, Shapiro would talk about the alleged 11PM phone call and talking to Juditha Brown about it to confirm what his defense investigators told him she said to them. They told Shapiro that he needed to interrogate her regarding an 11PM phone call, when he did he asked her how did she know it was 11PM and Juditha told him on page 33 of his book, SEARCH FOR JUSTICE that when she got home she looked at the clock and it stated 11PM. He would change her claims by stating that they would find that they made a mistake on the same page.
However, that does not distance himself from the malfeasance he and others on the Simpson defense team engaged in, including Johnnie Cochran. Five months later they set it up again, since Cochran was by July 1995, fully in charge of the Simpson defense team. He would stipulate also to the 09:37 PM phone call on July 06, 1995 the last day of the prosecution’s case. Then prior to giving his agreement to stipulate he would set a milestone marker, IMO, by contesting the jury being shown the bloody photos of the murdered victims in a CAL Criminal Code 352 Argument. When he gets to the end of the debate on how prejudicial showing those bloody photos would be to the jury he just happens to drop in the assertion “We didn’t or We’re not going to show the jury the phone bills or whatever”.
Why not? Why would showing phone records or phone bills to the jury potentially prejudice the jury? UNLESS….the Brown phone records did not say what you all had stipulated to back in February. Once the 352 argument was completed, on with the show, Cochran stipulated to the 09:37 PM phone call as well.
Many of us at OMIG disliked Cochran’s conduct for about 7 years from 2000-2007, then T.H. Johnson was presented with a book he received while doing some investigative assignment for OMIG in Texas. The book is entitled the last man standing and is about at the time the longest political prisoner the international watchers stated was held behind bars after the release of South Africa’s Nelson Mandela. That was the former Minister of Defense for the SOCAL chapter of the Black Panther Party, Elmer “Geronimo” Pratt. Railroaded as an innocent man by J. Edgar Hoover’s COINTELPRO targeting back in 1968, whereby in 1972 when his trial started the young, naive, Johnnie Cochran would be his criminal attorney. Cochran was so full of legal arrogance that he dismissed Pratt’s admonitions that he just didn’t understand, that the system had to convict him. Johnnie disagreed and simply pegged Pratt as being paranoid. However, Pratt was found guilty and sentenced to Life w/o parole but without any sense of malice he looked back over his shoulder and said to his lawyer, “Don’t forget me, Cochran, please don’t forget me”.
Pratt is truly the subtext in Cochran’s first book, IMO, JOURNEY TO JUSTICE. Cochran by that experience would be built into the formidable take no prisoners lawyer he became after that. He went from being a tearful, emotionally, broken man, due to that loss he blamed himself for with Pratt’s conviction, as well as a first wife he lost who questioned his ability to provide for a family as an ambulance chasing attorney when he came home to no furniture in the house.
Here Cochran is below:
That changed him, to where over his career he would be the only lawyer we’ve found in the state of California to have won the most OUTSTANDING CRIMINAL LAWYER annually awarded when he won the Jerry Geisler Award, (Geisler the former attorney to the stars). Cochran would also win the annual award for the TOP CIVIL LITIGATOR OF THE YEAR in California. Yet, we believe after talking to Pratt’s only lawyer for the 29 years he was incarcerated, Stuart Scanlon, of San Francisco, that Cochran was always there behind the scenes maneuvering to attain the Freedom of Pratt. However, everytime Scanlon and Pratt went to Court seeking to have new evidence heard that was withheld during his initial trial, evidence that the FBI had Pratt under photo surveillance up in the San Fran-Oakland Bay area called there by Huey Newton and Eldridge Cleaver back at the same time the murders occurred 400 miles away in the Los Angeles suburb of Santa Monica. The prosecutor Kalustian was now a senior judge in LA county and Scanlon found that the other judges in LA county were not going to rule against his sentencing of Pratt. Nor would they entertain appeals for the case to be removed.
Then 26 years later, along comes the Simpson celebrity trial of the Century. Johnnie Cochran who was not initially on the Simpson defense team, we believe knew not only did he need to get on it but to get to the front leading it. Afterall, Shapiro was not noted as a significant criminal attorney, he was noted as being a deal maker and allegedly wanted Simpson to take a plea to murder.
For awhile we thought that all Cochran needed was the malfeasance involving the phone records. However, after several more years something even bigger quietly would occur and that would be revealed after T.H. Johnson was asked back to be on a podcase called the Opperman Report. When he agreed, he asked where he could hear the first show and went to their link and saw that a witness who was prominent in the news during the Simpson trial but ultimately was not called to testify, a former FBI agent named Fred Whitehurst had been on the Opperman Report a year before OMIG’s Johnson. Johnson told us at OMIG that he was blown away by the interview and reached out to contact Whitehurst. He said he felt they were having a respectful conversation but nothing significant arising from it until Johnson told him another FBI agent had lied about the shoe prints named William Bodziak. Whitehurst said he thought he was a decent fellow, Johnson was adamant that he was a liar that knew that Simpson’s feet did not fit inside those 11 and-1/2 inch side walk tile police photos. OMIG sent off to Italy to attain the alleged size 12 shoe sole from SILGA’s U2887 rubber mold.
You can see Simpson’s green foot overlaid on top of that shoe sole on some of the other maddogg past OMIG posts. Simpson’s toes stick out the front of the shoe sole and arches ride over the sides and his heel rides on the back of the $200 casual shoe. Johnson assumed the contentiousness discussion was the end of their interaction. however, Whitehurst would contact Johnson the following day and told him that he had talked with some other former agents and that they had stored documents in a loft in Northern Virginia 20 years earlier related to the Simpson case that they wanted OMIG to have. He said that they did not think that there was anyone still interested in that case.
OMIG received the documents, all 53 pounds, and they tell their own story one which we believe Cochran may have been hoping for all along. The FBI agent Martz who was supposedly the LADA’s DNA Blood Expert, took an oath and took the stand in the Simpson trial to attempt to refute that the blood on the gate and the samples of blood sent to the FBI lab belonging to Nicole found on socks in OJ’s bedroom, were not contaminated with a preservative entitled EDTA. When he testified, other agents and scientists in the lab knew he would lie, because he had done it before in a death row appeal case five years earlier in Florida. The judge called him out in the order he wrote calling Roger Martz an incompetent and a charlatan. Martz had made his way up the ladder as an alleged brown noser to his superiors, so with only a bachelor’s degree in Biology he had been made the Unit Chief of the FBI Chemistry Lab. His shoot from the hip conclusions where he allegedly never exercised the scientific method of testing his conclusions got him in trouble as far as a lack of respect from his subordinates in the lab. The Simpson case gave them the opportunity to bring him down, but they chose to enlist Whitehurst to do it and author the complaint to the OIG of the USDOJ. Whitehurst’s career was already ruined after filing close to 200 complaints of unprofessional conduct within the FBI laboratory as if effected defendant’s cases. Whitehurst began going outside of the agency and his superiors after the first president George Bush passed an Executive Order 12731 to curb corruption within the Executive Branch of Government. Whitehurst took and over-advantage of that, and even though he was a top explosive’s expert, and PHd Chemist, he was demoted to the paint chip laboratory examining paint chips when approached by 4 agents to author the complaint against Martz.
He ultimately would agree to do so, and as a result was subpoenaed by Johnnie Cochran and the dream team to appear with his attorney in Los Angeles to be deposed and prepared to testify in the Simpson trial in August or Sept of 1995. When it came to the Director of the FBI, Louis Freeh, that Whitehurst had been subpoenaed to take the stand in the Simpson trial, he dispatched his top black general counsel to fly to LA and meet with Cochran to negotiate with him to keep him from calling Whitehurst to the witness stand. Freeh did not want Whitehurst potentially despoiling the well protected and crafted image of the FBI. Their brand image was that they were the world’s preeminent investigative agency. Whitehurst would remain in a 4 or 5 star hotel in Beverly Hills for 8 days. On the 8th day he would be called to the courthouse to sit on a bench for hours outside while wrangling went on inside. After those many hours passed the attorneys would emerge from Judge Ito’s courtroom and Whitehurst was told his services would not be needed that he could return to Washington D.C. whereby he would ultimately be offered $1,ooo,ooo to leave the bureau until his 57th birthday when he could retire and draw his full pension.
In the meantime, Cochran had something, and OMIG believes that something was the most formidable hammer one could have to move things relative to the Geronimo Pratt case, and that was the arm-in-arm backing of the FBI. The Pratt case would ultimately get removed in 1997 from LA county supposedly because a judge in the LA Superior Court had read an article in the California Lawyer’s Monthly magazine where Cochran roundly was criticizing the prosecutor in the 1972 case of Geronimo Pratt, now sitting judge Richard Kalustian. The angry Judge issued an order banning any judge in Los Angles Country from hearing a Pratt appeal. The case went back to San Francisco to be reassigned and the Geronimo Pratt appeal was sent to a judge down in Orange County, named Everette Eugene Dickey. Called a former Marine, who was a tough but fair judge. It was Dickey who would ultimately hear the appeal of Elmer “Geronimo” Pratt and as a result of the FBI photographs which had him under surveillance 400 miles away, Judge Dickey would immediately release him, over the feigned protests of LADA Gil Garcetti and a few others.
Cochran in the coming year would attain a settlement from LA County for $2.75 million and $1.0 million from the FBI for Pratt who would subsequently leave the US and reside in the East African nation of Tanzania until his death in 2011. Cochran as you know had a terminal brain tumor which would end his life in 2005, a tumor which OMIG suspects he knew he had for sometime. However, what OMIG doesn’t buy is an article that Johnnie Cochran wrote in a now defunct lawyer’s magazine as being the leverage that caused that Pratt Case after what Scanlon told OMIG investigators was about 25 years of appeals in the LA County Judicial system. OMIG thinks that the leverage came as a result of whatever deal was struck to keep one FBI agent from taking the witness stand and revealing the lies of another FBI agent, as well as other malfeasance the bureau was attempting to force him out for revealing.
That agent Frederic Whitehurst may have been the catalyst for what Cochran had been seeking for a quarter century when he last heard the words PLEASE DON’T FORGET ME, COCHRAN by a man condemned to die in prison in 1972. That never left Cochran’s mind, that is why I believe Cochran may have influenced Shapiro to simply go along with the malfeasance but stand aside and allow him to take the front seat on something that could have turned out much different.
LikeLike
I don’t want t hijack this thread but the late F Lee Bailey despised Shapiro who it seems was trying to cut a plea deal for OJ from the get go. Shapiro was going for a guilty plea with no trial from the get go. He was protecting the truth behind the murders of Brown and Goldman.
Two things about Shapiro
LikeLike
By the way, the image of the phone bill looks like it was faxed (the image quality of faxes in the 90s was awful). Or perhaps scanned — the image quality of scanners was often terrible back then as well. Do you have any idea as to what the source was? How it came to be circulated in the first place?
LikeLike
At OMIG we don’t give a D what it looked like, and the only reason we agreed to allow Lou Brown to send it to us was because his temperament had radically changed within the 4-day period in between when he first agreed to allow OMIG to attain them directly from the non-biased 3rd party, GTE Legal Archive Department in San Angelo, TX.
The OMIG investigator who Brown had confided in for two long 80-90 minute phone calls could tell that he no was no longer relaxed and seemed to be emotionally stressing over outside pressure, whereas he now stated on the following Monday it would be those records now provided by Deputy DA Bill Hodgman or none at all. OMIG wanted to see what would be sent and suspected just as you have seen they would receive some illegible B.S. being proclaimed as the factual document. We told Lou Brown then as I am glad to tell you now, that we would never accept anything coming from anyone other than the actual phone record as being the legitimate commodity.
As you have pointed out the flaws, this is certainly not acceptable to us at OMIG as being the legitimate commodity. We don’t care how many migitigating excuses those like you and others come up with. Your arguments are kind of like the arguments to put Simpson’s enormously large hands into those extremely small (for his hands) gloves. Only those still caught up in the addictive euphoric effect of that false narrative wants to present an argument that that document will do. If that is your intent, don’t stop at our doorstep in an attempt to make your case, since we are not caught up in that euphoric narcotic effect that many of you can’t part with that a Negro went feral and was driven over the emotional edge to stalk and kill a white woman. So passe, so antebellum, plus it does not line up with the empirical evidence they continue to hide to allow y’all to continue to enjoy that euphoric high. We are still demanding that the remnants of GTE landline provide a copy of the actual record since all of the main actors are deceased there is no reason to continue to conceal them from public examination.
LikeLike
HERE IS THE BACK GROUND TO THE QUESTION YOU ASKED.
It was sent to our Investigative Team Coordinator at OMIG’s Midwest office either in Missouri or Minnesota by fax, named T.H. Johnson, right before Christmas on December 21, 1999, by Louis Brown, Nicole Brown Simpson’s father. That was after about 6 weeks in passing since T.H. had initially asked for it to come from the GTE phone company in early November. T.H. had listened to Brown talk, allowing him to say whatever was on his mind for two long winded conversations as Brown talked mostly about how he and his wife, Juditha, had been attending an Evangelical gathering and now had been “born again”.
It was during that time on a Thursday around the second week of November 1999, that T.H. told him that they would like permission as required in the state of California to have GTE’s legal/archive department in San Angelo, TX to provide them with a copy of the Juditah Brown phone record for June 12, 1994, to replace that which had been surreptitiously removed from the Simpson case file. Brown initially agreed, and T.H. was comfortable waiting for a permission letter to come to the OMIG Los Angeles HDQTS allowing it to take a week. However, his brother, Doc Johnson, said “NO, a week was too long, get back to Brown on Monday”, four days later.
When T.H. got back to Brown on the following Monday, Lou Brown acted at first like he had great news for OMIG, telling him that he had talked to DDA Bill Hodgman and that Hodgman was willing to provide Lou with a copy of the phone records to give to OMIG. T.H. thanked him but told him that at this stage OMIG no longer trusted Hodgman and would rather have them come directly from an unbiased 3rfd party namely the GTE Legal/Archive Dept in San Angelo, Texas.
He told Lou since Hodgman had told T.H. a year earlier that he did not know where those records were when T.H. went to the DA’s office to find out why he removed them from the Exhibit Department in the sub-basement. His secretary was sent out to meet T.H. by going out a side door and peeping in the front door of the visitors seating area on the 18th floor of the courthouse and asking T.H. to step out in the hall where they could talk by the elevators. I am citing from T.H.’s book, PURSUIT OF EXHIBIT 35 IN THE OJ SIMPSON MURDER TRIAL AND ITS HIDDEN SECRETS published in 2011.
Though Hodgman’s secretary attempted to lie for him, OMIG had a copy of a letter from the Custodian of Records in December 1998 swearing that Hodgman had removed them. The letter pointed out that he had refused to sign the receipt manifest that he had come to the Exhibit Dept and attained those phone records along with 1,009 other exhibits in the Simpson trial with an Ex Parte Court Order issued by Judge John Reid on April 24, 1998. (After that experience on the order to remove documents, someone online would note from their court actions in San Angelo, TX that someone interested in the Simpson case would point out that the same judge had sealed two other documents that would potentially have impacted the Simpson case if made public.) That judge appeared to be in someone’s back pocket.
So, based on the previous 12 months of chicanery with Hodgman, T.H. Johnson said that it would be better for all parties if a copy was provided by a 3rd party with clean hands rather than anyone associated with these records with potentially unclean hands like Hodgman.
At that point, the nice guy Lou Brown had changed, just like switching on or off a light. It was like he had run into a Sasquatch out in the woods, he talked in a nervous tempo, changing to a hostile tone, accusing Johnson and OMIG of wanting the records for racial purposes, etc. T.H. denied Brown’s allegations of race and asked him when had race ever come up in their “Born-Again” conversations while listening to Brown proselytize about, he and his wife’s newfound Christian faith. Brown could only sheeplishly reply, “Never”. T.H. told him that it was simply a matter of accuracy while seeking the truth and justice.
Brown was still stalwart in his position and was not going to allow permission for the records to come from GTE, and told T.H. that it was the record you see delivered by Hodgman or nothing at all. Take it or leave it, was Brown’s nervous position at that point. Since they had not created any hostility over the prior month while they communicated, T.H. said he wanted to keep it that way, and agreed out of curiosity to allow Hodgman to send the records via Brown. He said that he did it to allow Brown to save face and be somewhat at psychological peace and to get off the hook of going back on his word. Although he warned Brown that OMIG would not consider whatever was sent by Hodgman to be a veritable copy of the actual Brown phone records.
He told Brown that that could only come from GTE, so do not assume that OMIG will be satisfied because Hodgman finally decided after a year to send a copy of the exhibit evidence he had removed from the case file. Presently, as far as OMIG was concerned, Hodgman had removed the phone records because T.H. was told by OMIG sources inside the LA Superior court clerk’s office that exhibits entered into a trial could not be sealed. Hodgman must have known that as well and beat them to the punch with a court order to remove them 8 months earlier.
This document posted in this article is how it looked inside that Exhibit 35 posterboard, it was illegible even with a smaller font. We simply attempted to blow it up around 400 per cent, so we could see the quality even at the smaller size level of what they were attempting to pass off as legitimate.
LikeLike
Sure it’s easy to get from Mezzaluna to Dana Point just like it’s easy to kill two people hand to hand with a knife then catch a plane to Chicago
LikeLike
“He represented Bruce Roman in the shooting attack against Gabby Horowitz the first husband of Marcia Clark. Bruce Roman was directed to Bob Shapiro by Marcia Clark. (Try that one on) Bruce Roman had performed the marital ceremony between Marcia Clark and her second husband Gordon Clark a member of the Church of Scientology”…….
This has always been troubling to some of OMIG’s investigative members. The guy that encouraged you and your first husband, Gabriel Horowitz, the professional Backgammon expert (professional cheater) that you, Marcia Clark, were claimed to follow around to those casinos like a puppy, befriended you and Gaby. His name, Bruce Roman, a priest or Bishop in the COS recommended you two to come there to attain marriage counseling.
Bruce allegedly became the road-dawg or traveling Backgammon buddy with your first husband Horowitz. In the meantime, you Marcia Clark, allegedly start having eyes for a low level administrator in the COS, Gordon Clark. So now the COS priest, Bishop, or whatever title agrees to marry both you and Gordon Clark.
The authorities at the Backgammon clubs catch up to Gabby’s cheating and allegedly ban him out of several of them for the things he was attempting to do, i.e. allegedly place magnets under backgammon tables and then place mercury laced dice into the game so their rolls could be controlled by the magnet to fall on numbers the cheater chose. Out of money, allegedly after helping pay for your law school education, he appears to start leaning and or stalking you, and becoming a pain in the butt for you and your new husband, Gordon Clark.
So, now his road dawg buddy, the bishop who allegedly married you to Gordon, is now with your first husband Gabby when he is allegedly being shown a gun, that allegedly goes off, ricochets, and strikes your first husband in the head. It turns him ultimately into a vegetable that his Israeli mother had to come and take him back to Israel to live out the rest of his life in a vegetative state. These are the allegations, none of which have been confirmed by OMIG, but they are certainly titillating to think about if any of the eventual outcome was true.
None of which has been under the 30-year scrutiny as the Simpson case with its addictive Euphoric effect. It has been the narrative of choice that so many have chosen to continue their fascination with. However, there is an allegation that Gabby Horowitz’s mother was not comfortable with the narrative of her son’s ultimate predicament. Wish we could hear a bit from her were she still living as well as Gabby, if he regained any of his normal faculties.
LikeLike
That’s some good background information, thanks. I saw another weird thing regarding the Simpson case and it came from Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti while he was on the Rich Eisen show in later summer of 2018. I think he was hawking a book.
Eisen amazingly asked a legitimate question, (I almost had a heart attack) he asked Gil “did you ever find the murder weapon”? And Gil almost blew up in Eisen’s face “We didn’t need a murder weapon we had a blood trail”. If anyone thought about it given the official time line of the murders according to Gil and company, OJ Simpson would not have had time to hide the murder weapon where LAPD with all their resources could not find it. Annd they still havent found it 30 years later! Impossible!
But the strangest thing Gil Garcetti admitted to, he told Rich Eisen he had had conversations with former President Jimmy Carter regarding the OJ Simpson case. My goodness but that’s strange. For folks old enough to remember Jimmy Carter and his administration oversaw the revelation of four of the biggest serial murder cases in this nations history.
LikeLike
“And Gil almost blew up in Eisen’s face “We didn’t need a murder weapon we had a blood trail”
=======================================
Really, Gil Garcetti, you had a “blood trail” as you say. The still unresolved issue was whether that blood trail was seeded with contaminated blood and why Singular told OMIG investigators he pleaded with the Simpson defense team almost 20 times to test the blood for EDTA contamination between August 8th-and-October 31st, 1994, when they ultimately parted company in their informal relationship.
An anonymous member of your Los Angeles Police Dept. according to Stephen Singular’s book, LEGACY OF DECEPTION meeting with Singular on August 1, 1994, in a Denver hotel room stated that none of the blood should be trusted. That became the Alpha point of the alleged conspiracy in destroying this black man, Simpson’s, professional career. It appeared that you and the prosecutors of LADA’s office as well as members of the LAPD, were creating a diversion to redirect public attention away from other acts of corruption and malfeasance involving sworn court officers’ involvement within the city and county of Los Angeles, CA.
The Omega point of the alleged conspiracy would begin when Singular’s publisher and Dove Books owner, Michael Viner, would decide to take it upon himself to violate the client agreement and NDA between he and Singular. He did so, to insert himself into the Simpson matter, when he and his attorney decided to bring the Legacy of Deception manuscript to the attention first of DDA Chris Darden in the LADA’s office. Chris allegedly got scared and ran off to Marcia Clark demanding that she take back the designated assignment for Darden to manage two LAPD officers he did not trust, Fuhrman and Vannatter.
That activity would seep into the hearing range of the DNA prosecutor on loan from Northern California’s Alameda Office, in Oakland, CA. His name was Rockne Harmon and he feigned in a loud enough proclamation that he was going to prove Singular a liar and charlatan and run him out of town. He would do so by sending samples of the blood from the gate identified as blood swatch 47 and a sample of a cutting from the socks found on Simpson’s bedroom floor containing Nicole Brown Simpson’s blood to the FBI laboratory in Washington, DC. In his accompanying letter he would tell the FBI analysts he wanted them to refute the claim of there being any blood contamination with EDTA.
The Unit Chief of the FBI Chemistry Lab, Roger Martz, would accommodate Rockne Harmon’s request by sending a letter back to him in the LADA’s office stating that he had examined the blood samples from the Simpson blood found on the gate, and his ex-wife’s blood found on the socks and could find no EDTA contamination whatsoever.
However, Martz allegedly did not conduct the blood examination, nor set up the protocol to conduct the blood examination probably because he truly did not have the skills as a biologist to set up such protocols. Someone among that group possibly got in touch with the Simpson defense team leader, Johnnie Cochran, and recommended that if the Prosecution was no longer going to call Martz as a prosecution witness, then the defense should call him and ask to treat him as a hostile witness.
The Chemists within the lab urged another PHD Chemist named Fred Whitehurst now reduced to examining paint chips in that laboratory to file a complaint with the Office of the Inspector General of the US Dept of Justice which he had done on approximately 150-200 other occasions concerning malfeasance, sloppiness, insensitive racial misconduct within the lab. Whitehurst demanded that the 4 chemists and agents were obligated to file the complaint if they knew something or suspected something to be wrongfully committed in the Executive Branch of Government. This was according to an Executive Order issued by the first President George H.W. Bush, 12731, issued in 1989.
Ultimately, the agents refused to file the complaint so Whitehurst would file it and get subpoenaed by the Simpson defense team when the OIG office informed the Simpson defense that a complaint regarding one of the expert witnesses had been filed with their office. Under intense examination as a hostile witness, FBI Special Agent, Roger Martz would admit that the blood was contaminated with EDTA in contradiction to what he initially stated in his letter to the LADA back on March 01, 1995.
The Whitehurst complaint articulated how and what agent Roger Martz lied about concerning the contaminated blood, so the Defense subpoenaed Whitehurst to come with his attorney to LA and be ready to take the witness stand and testify. He would be put up in a hotel in Beverly Hills by the defense team and remain there 8 days.
In the meantime, when the Director of the FBI, who had been attempting to force Whitehurst out of the Bureau, heard that he was being subpoenaed by the Simpson defense team to testify about another agent committing perjury while under oath, he acted immediately to send his top black general counsel of the FBI out to Los Angeles to negotiate with Cochran to not call Whitehurst to the witness stand. This was out of fear that it would tarnish the FBI’s image of being the preeminent investigative agency in the world. With all that Whitehurst could talk about beyond simply the malfeasance of Roger Martz could severely damage the image and brand of the FBI.
Whitehurst told OMIG that he was told to be at the courthouse on the 8th day and sat outside the courtroom for hours until they came out and Cochran and others told him his services would no longer be needed.
OMIG investigators would like to know what type of deal was struck to keep a credible FBI agent off the witness stand named Whitehurst. His testimony against another peer of the bureau, Martz, who had committed perjury and lied on the witness stand could have been exponentially helpful to OJ in the Simpson trial. This would have been extremely beneficial against the prosecution and police engaging in a corrupt conspiracy to destroy Simpson’s career.
People still want to believe that the blood implicates Simpson even though the prosecution accused Simpson of walking along the fence line of his neighbor next door upon leaving the Bronco and climbing over that dividing fence 210 feet down the line. However, police testimony from the Detectives is that they saw no blood trail down the side of the fence. After Simpson allegedly dropped a bloody glove on his own property the police testified that they saw no blood trail leading from the location of the glove back to the front of his house where he turned at the garage to walk towards the entry of his front door. He did not walk all the way back to the Rockingham gate according to the siting of Simpson by Allan Parks.
No one testified that Simpson entered through the Rockingham gate at the front of his property where blood was allegedly found at the beginning of his estate leading from there and depositing 8 drops turning northeast into his front entry. So, if Simpson did not enter through the Rockingham gate where drops were immediately found, and Simpson turned short of the Rockingham gate by about 70 feet when allegedly walking back down the sidewalk from where he dropped the glove, how did the blood get immediately inside of the Rockingham gate?
https://maddoggbuttkickingbrown.blog/2015/11/02/oj-simpsons-longest-run-against-his-toughest-opponent-subconscious-racism/
Simpson allegedly turned to enter his house coming from the rear towards the front garage where he turned to walk towards his house entry, that’s about 70-80 feet inside the property from the front Rockingham gate, so how did that blood trail get deposited right inside the Rockingham gate if Simpson did not allegedly enter through the gate?
LikeLike